Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Variation in T-SPOT.TB spot interpretation between independent observers from different laboratories

  • Willeke P. J. Franken
  • , Steven Thijsen
  • , Ron Wolterbeek
  • , John J. M. Bouwman
  • , Hanane el Bannoudi
  • , Sandra V. Kik
  • , Jaap T. van Dissel
  • , Sandra M. Arend
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • Diakonessenhuis Utrecht
  • Diakonessenhuis Zeist
  • KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation, The Hague
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

T-SPOT.TB is a specific assay for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. The assay needs to be performed with freshly isolated cells, and interpretation requires training. T-SPOT.TB has been used in various clinical-epidemiological settings, but so far no studies have evaluated the effect of interobserver variation in test reading. Our aim was to evaluate variation between different observers in reading T-SPOT.TB results. The study was nested within an ongoing cohort study, in which part of the T-SPOT.TB had been performed with frozen material. Culture plates were read visually by four different observers from two laboratories and by two automated readers. Of 313 T-SPOT.TB assays, 235 were performed with fresh cells and 78 were performed with frozen cells. No significant difference was found between results obtained with fresh cells and those obtained with frozen cells. The percentage of positive results varied between readers by maximally 15%; five/six raters were within a 6% difference in positive results. Analysis of the observed interrater differences showed that some individuals systematically counted more spots than others did. Because test interpretation includes subtraction of background values, this systematic variance had little influence on interindividual differences. The test result as positive or negative varied between independent raters, mainly due to samples with values around the cutoff. This warrants further study regarding determinants affecting the reading of T-SPOT.TB. Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1439-1442
JournalClinical and vaccine immunology
Volume16
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Variation in T-SPOT.TB spot interpretation between independent observers from different laboratories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this