Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Use of long-acting muscarinic antagonists for severe asthma: insights from clinicians in the SHARP network

  • Alessandro Marcon*
  • , Luigi Martinelli
  • , Aruna T. Bansal
  • , Emmanuelle Berret
  • , Apostolos Bossios
  • , Pierpaolo Marchetti
  • , Celeste Porsbjerg
  • , Stefania Principe
  • , Florence Schleich
  • , Svetlana Sergejeva
  • , Jacob K. Sont
  • , Marco Caminati
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Verona
  • Acclarogen
  • European Respiratory Society
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • University of Liege
  • North Estonia Medical Centre
  • Leiden University
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: There is limited real-world evidence on the use and positioning of inhaled long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) for treating severe asthma. Objective: We aimed to assess the differences in clinicians’ perspectives on prescribing LAMA for severe asthma across Europe. Methods: Within the Severe Heterogeneous Asthma Research collaboration, Patient-centred (SHARP) network, we conducted a multi-country survey of 470 respiratory clinicians in 2023-24. Results: Most participants were pneumonologists (83%). 68% reported using specific criteria for prescribing LAMA for severe asthma, primarily fixed bronchial obstruction (68%), frequent asthma exacerbations (65%), and a history of smoking (53%). Improved quality of life, lung function improvement, and reduction of asthma exacerbations were the three expected outcomes of LAMA treatment that showed the largest agreement across clinicians (85–95%). As compared to non-severe asthma specialists (about 50% of the sample), severe asthma specialists were more likely to report always prescribing LAMA before biologics (54 vs. 41%) and before oral corticosteroids (OCS) (51 vs. 40%). Approximately 90% of participants prioritised tapering or discontinuing OCS before stopping LAMA. Overall, participants in Northern (n = 73) and Western Europe (n = 71) appeared less prone to prescribe LAMA and less confident in their benefits compared to those from Eastern (n = 88) and Southern Europe (n = 238). In particular, most participants from Latvia (91%) and Lithuania (67%) reported that LAMAs are not reimbursed for severe asthma in their countries. Most participants who expressed their opinion favoured triple therapy (n = 236) over single inhaler therapy (n = 91). Conclusion: Our findings show that barriers and heterogeneous approaches still limit LAMA prescription for severe asthma in Europe, potentially leading to the underuse of this treatment option. Establishing a clear role for LAMA within a precision medicine framework is crucial; this aspect is not yet firmly supported by current international recommendations.
Original languageEnglish
Article number306
JournalRespiratory Research
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Asthma care
  • Bronchodilators
  • Clinical guidelines
  • Controller medication
  • Geographical variability
  • Real-world evidence
  • Severe asthma
  • Survey-based research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Use of long-acting muscarinic antagonists for severe asthma: insights from clinicians in the SHARP network'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this