Abstract
Objective: To compare pregnancy rates (PRs) after ultrasound-guided embryo transfer and embryo transfer based on ultrasonographic length measurement. Design: Prospective intervention group combined with retrospective control group. Setting: University fertility clinic. Patient(s): Patients undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Intervention(s): Transabdominal ultrasonographic guidance at embryo transfer. Main Outcome Measure(s): Pregnancy and implantation rates. Result(s): In 367 ultrasound-guided embryo transfers clinical PR, ongoing PR, and implantation rate were 35.1%, 31.1%, and 24.3%, respectively. In 363 embryo transfers based on previous ultrasonographic length measurement, the rates were 33.9%, 29.5%, and 24.2%, respectively. There were no statistical significant differences between the groups. Conclusion(s): Ultrasonographic guidance does not show any benefit in terms of PR and implantation rate compared to previous ultrasonographic length measurement, an other precise and atraumatic transfer technique.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 867-872 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Fertility and sterility |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2006 |
Keywords
- embryo transfer
- In vitro fertilization
- ultrasonographic guidance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ultrasonographic-guided embryo transfer does not enhance pregnancy rates compared with embryo transfer based on previous uterine length measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver