Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Trends and variation in the use of radiotherapy in non-metastatic prostate cancer: A 12-year nationwide overview from the Netherlands

  • Jelle Evers*
  • , Linda G. W. Kerkmeijer
  • , Roderick C. N. van den Bergh
  • , Maurice J. C. van der Sangen
  • , Maarten C. C. M. Hulshof
  • , Monique C. W. M. Bloemers
  • , Sabine Siesling
  • , Mieke J. Aarts
  • , Katja K. H. Aben
  • , Henk Struikmans
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Twente
  • Department of Research & Development, IKNL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
  • Catharina Hospital
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Leiden University Medical Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: This population-based study describes nationwide trends and variation in the use of primary radiotherapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer in The Netherlands in 2008–2019. Methods: Prostate cancer patients were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (N = 103,059). Treatment trends were studied over time by prognostic risk groups. Multilevel analyses were applied to identify variables associated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachy-monotherapy versus no active treatment in low-risk disease, and EBRT versus radical prostatectomy in intermediate and high-risk disease. Results: EBRT use remained stable (5–6%) in low-risk prostate cancer and increased from 21% to 32% in intermediate-risk, 37% to 45% in high-risk localized and 50% to 57% in high-risk locally advanced disease. Brachy-monotherapy decreased from 19% to 6% and from 15% to 10% in low and intermediate-risk disease, respectively, coinciding an increase of no active treatment from 55% to 73% in low-risk disease. Use of EBRT or brachy-monotherapy versus no active treatment in low-risk disease differed by region, T-stage and patient characteristics. Hospital characteristics were not associated with treatment in low-risk disease, except for availability of brachy-monotherapy in 2008–2013. Age, number of comorbidities, travel time for EBRT, prognostic risk group, and hospital characteristics were associated with EBRT versus prostatectomy in intermediate and high-risk disease. Conclusion: Intermediate/high-risk PCa was increasingly managed with EBRT, while brachy-monotherapy in low/intermediate-risk PCa decreased. In low-risk PCa, the no active treatment-approach increased. Variation in treatment suggests treatment decision related to patient/disease characteristics. In intermediate/high-risk disease, variation seems furthermore related to the treatment modalities available in the diagnosing hospitals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)134-142
Number of pages9
JournalRadiotherapy and oncology
Volume177
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Brachytherapy
  • Epidemiology
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostatic neoplasms
  • Radiotherapy
  • Watchful waiting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Trends and variation in the use of radiotherapy in non-metastatic prostate cancer: A 12-year nationwide overview from the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this