Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Treatment and prognostic factors of radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) after primary breast cancer: A systematic review

  • A. L. Depla
  • , C. H. Scharloo-Karels
  • , M. A. A. de Jong
  • , S. Oldenborg
  • , M. W. Kolff
  • , S. B. Oei
  • , F. van Coevorden
  • , G. C. van Rhoon
  • , E. A. Baartman
  • , R. J. Scholten
  • , J. Crezee
  • , G. van Tienhoven
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Department of Radiation Oncology and Hyperthermia, Institute Verbeeten, Netherlands
  • Department of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Netherlands
  • Erasmus MC Cancer Institute
  • Dutch Cochrane Center, Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast is a rare, aggressive disease. The incidence is increasing with the prolonged survival of women irradiated for primary breast cancer. Surgery is the current treatment of choice. Prognosis is poor. This review aims to evaluate all publications on primary treatment of RAAS to identify prognostic factors and evaluate treatment modalities. Methods: Databases were searched for articles with published individual patient data on prognostic factors, treatment and follow-up of patients with RAAS. A regression analysis was performed to test the prognostic values of age, interval between primary treatment and RAAS, tumour size and grade on the local recurrence-free interval (LRFI) and overall survival (OS). The effects of treatment modalities surgery, radiation (with or without hyperthermia) and chemotherapy or combinations were evaluated. Results: 74 articles were included, representing data on 222 patients. In these patients, the 5-year OS was 43% and 5-year LRFI was 32%. Tumour size and age were significant prognostic factors on LRFI and OS. Of all patients, 68% received surgery alone, 17% surgery and reirradiation and 6% surgery with chemotherapy. The remaining 9% received primary treatments without surgery. Surgery with radiotherapy had a better 5-year LRFI of 57% compared to 34% for surgery alone (p = 0.008). The value of other treatment modalities could not be assessed. Conclusions: This systematic review confirms the poor prognosis of RAAS. Tumour size and age were of prognostic value. The addition of reirradiation to surgery in the treatment of RAAS appears to enhance local control. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1779-1788
JournalEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England
Volume50
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment and prognostic factors of radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) after primary breast cancer: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this