Abstract
Developments in the technology applied to the field of minimally invasive surgery have led to the exploration of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Extensive research and continuous evolution have resulted in two commercially available HIFU devices: the Ablatherm and the Sonablate500. These devices are conceptually the same; however, specific technical differences exist. This paper reviews the clinical outcomes obtained with these devices, evaluates the quality of the evidence from the individual trials, and provides the results of a head-to-head comparison in terms of oncologic outcomes and complication rates
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 221-229 |
| Journal | Journal of endourology / Endourological Society |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound devices: a critical appraisal of the available evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver