Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide analysis of the first COVID-19 wave in the Netherlands

  • M. J. P. Rooijakkers
  • , W. W. L. Li
  • , N. A. Stens
  • , M. M. Vis
  • , P. A. L. Tonino
  • , L. Timmers
  • , N. M. van Mieghem
  • , P. den Heijer
  • , S. Kats
  • , P. R. Stella
  • , V. Roolvink
  • , H. W. van der Werf
  • , M. G. Stoel
  • , C. E. Schotborgh
  • , G. Amoroso
  • , F. Porta
  • , F. van der Kley
  • , M. H. van Wely
  • , H. Gehlmann
  • , L. A. F. M. van Garsse
  • G. S. C. Geuzebroek, M. W. A. Verkroost, J. M. Mourisse, N. M. Medendorp, N. van Royen*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Catharina Hospital
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
  • Erasmus MC
  • Amphia Hospital
  • Maastricht University
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Isala Clinics
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente
  • Haga Ziekenhuis
  • Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
  • Medical Centre Leeuwarden
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • Netherlands Heart Registration, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers
  • St. Antonius Hospital
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Amphia ziekenhuis
  • University of Limburg
  • Utrecht University
  • University of Groningen
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente (MST)
  • OLVG West
  • Leiden University
  • Netherlands Heart Registration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has put tremendous pressure on healthcare systems. Most transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) centres have adopted different triage systems and procedural strategies to serve highest-risk patients first and to minimise the burden on hospital logistics and personnel. We therefore assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient selection, type of anaesthesia and outcomes after TAVI. Methods: We used data from the Netherlands Heart Registration to examine all patients who underwent TAVI between March 2020 and July 2020 (COVID cohort), and between March 2019 and July 2019 (pre-COVID cohort). We compared patient characteristics, procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes. Results: We examined 2131 patients who underwent TAVI (1020 patients in COVID cohort, 1111 patients in pre-COVID cohort). EuroSCORE II was comparable between cohorts (COVID 4.5 ± 4.0 vs pre-COVID 4.6 ± 4.2, p = 0.356). The number of TAVI procedures under general anaesthesia was lower in the COVID cohort (35.2% vs 46.5%, p < 0.001). Incidences of stroke (COVID 2.7% vs pre-COVID 1.7%, p = 0.134), major vascular complications (2.3% vs 3.4%, p = 0.170) and permanent pacemaker implantation (10.0% vs 9.4%, p = 0.634) did not differ between cohorts. Thirty-day and 150-day mortality were comparable (2.8% vs 2.2%, p = 0.359 and 5.2% vs 5.2%, p = 0.993, respectively). Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, patient characteristics and outcomes after TAVI were not different than before the pandemic. This highlights the fact that TAVI procedures can be safely performed during the COVID-19 pandemic, without an increased risk of complications or mortality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-509
Number of pages7
JournalNetherlands heart journal
Volume30
Issue number11
Early online date2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Aortic valve stenosis
  • COVID-19
  • Postoperative complications
  • Registries
  • Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
  • Treatment outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transcatheter aortic valve implantation amid the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide analysis of the first COVID-19 wave in the Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this