TY - JOUR
T1 - Training Improves Interobserver Reliability for the Diagnosis of Scaphoid Fracture Displacement
AU - Buijze, Geert A.
AU - Guitton, Thierry G.
AU - van Dijk, C. Niek
AU - Ring, David
AU - AUTHOR GROUP
AU - Osterman, A. Lee
AU - Wahegaonkar, Abhijeet L.
AU - Ladd, Amy
AU - Barquet, Antonio
AU - van Vugt, Arie B.
AU - Shyam, Ashok K.
AU - Swigart, Carrie
AU - Coles, Chad P.
AU - Zalavras, Charalampos
AU - Goldfarb, Charles A.
AU - Cassidy, Charles
AU - Allan, Christopher
AU - Beingessner, Daphne
AU - Kalainov, David M.
AU - Eygendaal, Denise
AU - Sancheti, Parag
AU - Feibel, Robert J.
AU - Rocha, Steve
AU - Grosso, Elena
AU - Frihagen, Frede
AU - Dyer, George S. M.
AU - Athwal, George S.
AU - Goslings, J. Carel
AU - Della Rocca, Gregory J.
AU - Harris, Ian
AU - Fanuele, Jason C.
AU - Lawton, Jeff
AU - Jiuliano, John
AU - McAuliffe, John
AU - Capo, John T.
AU - Conflitti, Joseph M.
AU - Segalman, Keith
AU - Egol, Kenneth
AU - Ponsen, Kornelis J.
AU - Jeray, Kyle
AU - Lattanza, Lisa
AU - Catalano, Louis
AU - Swiontkowski, Marc
AU - Boyer, Martin
AU - Richardson, Martin
AU - Soong, Maximillian
AU - Baskies, Michael
AU - Prayson, Michael
AU - McKee, Michael
AU - Chen, Neal C.
AU - Kloen, Peter
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - The diagnosis of displacement in scaphoid fractures is notorious for poor interobserver reliability. We tested whether training can improve interobserver reliability and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture displacement on radiographs and CT scans. Sixty-four orthopaedic surgeons rated a set of radiographs and CT scans of 10 displaced and 10 nondisplaced scaphoid fractures for the presence of displacement, using a web-based rating application. Before rating, observers were randomized to a training group (34 observers) and a nontraining group (30 observers). The training group received an online training module before the rating session, and the nontraining group did not. Interobserver reliability for training and nontraining was assessed by Siegel's multirater kappa and the Z-test was used to test for significance. There was a small, but significant difference in the interobserver reliability for displacement ratings in favor of the training group compared with the nontraining group. Ratings of radiographs and CT scans combined resulted in moderate agreement for both groups. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnosing displacement of scaphoid fractures were, respectively, 83%, 85%, and 84% for the nontraining group and 87%, 86%, and 87% for the training group. Assuming a 5% prevalence of fracture displacement, the positive predictive value was 0.23 in the nontraining group and 0.25 in the training group. The negative predictive value was 0.99 in both groups. Our results suggest training can improve interobserver reliability and sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture displacement, but the improvements are slight. These findings are encouraging for future research regarding interobserver variation and how to reduce it further
AB - The diagnosis of displacement in scaphoid fractures is notorious for poor interobserver reliability. We tested whether training can improve interobserver reliability and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture displacement on radiographs and CT scans. Sixty-four orthopaedic surgeons rated a set of radiographs and CT scans of 10 displaced and 10 nondisplaced scaphoid fractures for the presence of displacement, using a web-based rating application. Before rating, observers were randomized to a training group (34 observers) and a nontraining group (30 observers). The training group received an online training module before the rating session, and the nontraining group did not. Interobserver reliability for training and nontraining was assessed by Siegel's multirater kappa and the Z-test was used to test for significance. There was a small, but significant difference in the interobserver reliability for displacement ratings in favor of the training group compared with the nontraining group. Ratings of radiographs and CT scans combined resulted in moderate agreement for both groups. The average sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnosing displacement of scaphoid fractures were, respectively, 83%, 85%, and 84% for the nontraining group and 87%, 86%, and 87% for the training group. Assuming a 5% prevalence of fracture displacement, the positive predictive value was 0.23 in the nontraining group and 0.25 in the training group. The negative predictive value was 0.99 in both groups. Our results suggest training can improve interobserver reliability and sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture displacement, but the improvements are slight. These findings are encouraging for future research regarding interobserver variation and how to reduce it further
U2 - 10.1007/s11999-012-2260-4
DO - 10.1007/s11999-012-2260-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 22290132
SN - 0009-921X
VL - 470
SP - 2029
EP - 2034
JO - Clinical orthopaedics and related research
JF - Clinical orthopaedics and related research
IS - 7
ER -