Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Toward better technology for social health in dementia: a review of implementation recommendations and research priorities to equitably meet the demand

  • Dorota Szcześniak
  • , Mauricio Molinari-Ulate
  • , David Peter Neal
  • , Sara Laureen Bartels
  • , Angie Alejandra Diaz Baquero
  • , Efrain David Rujano Vasques
  • , Jochen René Thyrian
  • , Manuel Franco-Martin
  • , Karin Wolf-Ostermann
  • , Joanna Rymaszewska
  • , Louise Hopper
  • , Rose-Marie Dröes
  • Wrocław Medical University
  • University of Costa Rica
  • Maastricht University
  • Universidad de Salamanca
  • German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • University of Bremen
  • Wrocław University of Science and Technology
  • Dublin City University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Social health is increasingly recognized as a key dimension of wellbeing in dementia, yet it remains unclear to what extent available assistive technologies are personalisable, usable, and effective in addressing related unmet needs. Objective: This umbrella review aimed to (1) identify how many and which technologies are personalisable, usable and effective in supporting social health in dementia, and (2) synthesize recommendations from the current literature on how to improve equitable implementation. Methods: An explorative review of reviews was conducted, including 28 reviews published between 2007 and 2024. The INDUCT/DISTINCT Best Practice Guidance for Human Interaction with Technology in Dementia was also included. Technologies and recommendations were analyzed using a combined frequency-based and thematic approach and categorized according to the three social health domains (fulfilling potential and obligations; managing life with some degree of independence; participation in social activities) and across micro-, meso-, and macrolevels. Results: Of all technologies discussed, 48% were reported as personalisable and 59% as usable. However, only 23% of personalisable technologies demonstrated effectiveness in at least one randomized controlled trial. Most evidence related to the domain of managing life with some degree of independence, while fewer technologies showed demonstrated effectiveness for fulfilling potential or enhancing social participation. Recommendations primarily addressed implementation strategies, equity considerations, and stakeholder collaboration. Future research priorities included the development of needs-based, personalisable, and diversity-sensitive technologies, improved methodological rigor, and supportive policy and funding structures. Conclusions: While half of the technologies are described as adaptable to user needs, preferences or abilities and more than half as usable, robust evidence for their effectiveness in promoting social health remains limited. Clearer operationalisation of personalisation, stronger evaluation designs and improved implementation strategies are needed to ensure that people with dementia can equitably access technologies that promote their social health.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1767647
Number of pages1
JournalFrontiers in public health
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

Keywords

  • best practice guidance
  • dementia
  • effectiveness
  • implementation
  • personalisable technology
  • research recommendations
  • usability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Toward better technology for social health in dementia: a review of implementation recommendations and research priorities to equitably meet the demand'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this