Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Time to Viral Rebound After Interruption of Modern Antiretroviral Therapies

  • Jonathan Z. Li
  • , Evgenia Aga
  • , Ronald J. Bosch
  • , Mark Pilkinton
  • , Eugène Kroon
  • , Lynsay MacLaren
  • , Michael Keefer
  • , Lawrence Fox
  • , Liz Barr
  • , Edward Acosta
  • , Jintanat Ananworanich
  • , Robert Coombs
  • , John W. Mellors
  • , Alan L. Landay
  • , Bernard Macatangay
  • , Steven Deeks
  • , Rajesh T. Gandhi
  • , Davey M. Smith
  • Harvard University
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Thai Red Cross Society
  • Washington DC
  • University of Rochester
  • National Institutes of Health
  • ACTG Community Scientific Sub-Committee
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • University of Washington
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Rush University
  • University of California at San Francisco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

446 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Development of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remission strategies requires precise information on time to HIV rebound after treatment interruption, but there is uncertainty regarding whether modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens and timing of ART initiation may affect this outcome. METHODS: AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5345 enrolled individuals who initiated ART during chronic or early HIV infection and on suppressive ART for ≥2 years. Participants underwent carefully monitored antiretroviral interruption. ART was restarted upon 2 successive viral loads ≥1000 copies/mL. We compared participants of A5345 with participants of 6 historic ACTG treatment interruption studies. RESULTS: Thirty-three chronic-treated and 12 early-treated participants interrupted ART with evaluable time to viral rebound. Median time to viral rebound ≥1000 HIV RNA copies/mL was 22 days. Acute retroviral rebound syndrome was diagnosed in 9% of the chronic-treated and none of the early-treated individuals. All participants of the historic studies were on older protease inhibitor-based regimens, whereas 97% of A5345 participants were on integrase inhibitor-based ART. There were no differences in the timing of viral rebound comparing A5345 versus historic studies. In a combined analysis, a higher percentage of early-treated participants remained off ART at posttreatment interruption week 12 (chronic vs early: 2% vs 9%, P = .0496). One chronic-treated and one early-treated A5345 participant remained off ART for >24 weeks. All participants resuppressed after ART reinitiation. CONCLUSIONS: Early ART initiation, using either older or newer ART regimens, was associated with a significant delay in the time to HIV rebound after ART interruption, lowering the barrier for HIV remission.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)865-870
Number of pages6
JournalClinical infectious diseases
Volume74
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • HIV treatment interruption
  • posttreatment controller
  • viral rebound

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Time to Viral Rebound After Interruption of Modern Antiretroviral Therapies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this