Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

“This also matters to me”: what does adherence to dementia risk reduction interventions mean to members of the public?

  • Ana Maria Diaz-Ponce*
  • , Sarah Campill
  • , Mariagnese Barbera
  • , Cindy Birck
  • , Natalia Soldevila-Domenech
  • , Laura Forcano Gamazo
  • , Amaia Ayala-Garcia
  • , Francesca Mangialasche
  • , Jeroen Bruinsma
  • , Marissa Zwan
  • , Tobias Hartmann
  • , Rafael de la Torre-Fornell
  • , Alina Solomon
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Alzheimer Europe
  • University of Eastern Finland
  • Imperial College London
  • Hospital del Mar
  • Pasqual Maragall Foundation
  • University of the Basque Country
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Maastricht University
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Saarland University
  • CIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Growing evidence highlights the potential of multidomain lifestyle-based interventions to reduce the risk of cognitive decline among older adults at higher risk of cognitive impairment. Within these complex and often demanding interventions, adherence has emerged as a key factor influencing both outcomes and impact. Numerous studies have explored adherence from the perspective of researchers which is often defined as the extent to which a person’s behaviour corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider. However, less is known about how members of the public understand and experience it. This article presents insights gathered from Advisory Boards established within three European-funded projects, as part of Public Involvement activities led by Alzheimer Europe in collaboration with researchers in the projects. The discussions involved 23 members of the public (lay people with and without dementia) from nine European countries and focused on adherence in the context of research-based multidomain lifestyle interventions to reduce dementia risk. Feedback from Advisory Boards members were grouped in three overarching themes: (1) “Baking your own cake” which highlights the relevance and understandings of adherence from members of the public; (2) “Striking a balance” which refers to the complexity and influencing factors linked to adherence; and (3) “A two-way process” which emphasises the involvement of members of the public and the importance of clear communication and appropriate support throughout the intervention process. Promoting adherence requires recognising participants as active partners in research which may not only improve adherence itself but also enhance the relevance, effectiveness and long-term impact of dementia prevention efforts.
Original languageEnglish
Article number32
JournalAging clinical and experimental research
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Dementia
  • Intensity
  • Lifestyle intervention
  • Multimodal intervention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“This also matters to me”: what does adherence to dementia risk reduction interventions mean to members of the public?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this