Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

  • Schalk W. van der Merwe*
  • , Roy L. J. van Wanrooij
  • , Michiel Bronswijk
  • , Simon Everett
  • , Sundeep Lakhtakia
  • , Mihai Rimbas
  • , Tomas Hucl
  • , Rastislav Kunda
  • , Abdenor Badaoui
  • , Ryan Law
  • , Paolo G. Arcidiacono
  • , Alberto Larghi
  • , Marc Giovannini
  • , Mouen A. Khashab
  • , Kenneth F. Binmoeller
  • , Marc Barthet
  • , Manuel Perez-Miranda
  • , Jeanin E. van Hooft
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • KU Leuven
  • Imelda Hospital
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology India
  • Colentina Hospital
  • Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
  • Université catholique de Louvain
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • From the Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience (P.P.), and Neurology Unite (P.P.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; and Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences (M.M.S.), MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
  • Institut Paoli Calmettes
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • California Pacific Medical Center
  • Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Timone
  • Hospital Universitario Río Hortega
  • Leiden University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

106 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Main Recommendations 1 ESGE recommends the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) over percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in malignant distal biliary obstruction when local expertise is available. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2 ESGE suggests EUS-BD with hepaticogastrostomy only for malignant inoperable hilar biliary obstruction with a dilated left hepatic duct when inadequately drained by ERCP and/or PTBD in high volume expert centers. Weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 3 ESGE recommends that EUS-guided pancreatic duct (PD) drainage should only be considered in symptomatic patients with an obstructed PD when retrograde endoscopic intervention fails or is not possible. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 4 ESGE recommends rendezvous EUS techniques over transmural PD drainage in patients with favorable anatomy owing to its lower rate of adverse events. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5 ESGE recommends that, in patients at high surgical risk, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (GBD) should be favored over percutaneous gallbladder drainage where both techniques are available, owing to the lower rates of adverse events and need for re-interventions in EUS-GBD. Strong recommendation, high quality of evidence. 6 ESGE recommends EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), in an expert setting, for malignant gastric outlet obstruction, as an alternative to enteral stenting or surgery. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 7 ESGE recommends that EUS-GE may be considered in the management of afferent loop syndrome, especially in the setting of malignancy or in poor surgical candidates. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 8 ESGE suggests that endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric ERCP (EDGE) can be offered, in expert centers, to patients with a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass following multidisciplinary decision-making, with the aim of overcoming the invasiveness of laparoscopy-assisted ERCP and the limitations of enteroscopy-assisted ERCP. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)185-205
Number of pages21
JournalEndoscopy
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this