Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The time of death in Dutch court; using the Daubert criteria to evaluate methods to estimate the PMI used in court

  • Tamara Gelderman*
  • , Erik Stigter
  • , Tristan Krap
  • , Jens Amendt
  • , Wilma Duijst
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Maastricht University
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Ars Cogniscendi Foundation for Legal and Forensic Medicine, Zuiderzeestraatweg 404, 8091 PB, Wezep, The Netherlands
  • Goethe University Frankfurt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

When a capital crime is committed the post-mortem interval (PMI) is of particular importance in investigating a suspect's alibi in court. A forensic expert can use different methods to estimate the PMI. This research focuses on who is considered an expert in court and whether the methods used to estimate the PMI are reliable. In this study, the methods used to estimate the PMI and the experts consulted, available in Dutch jurisprudence, in the period 2010–2019 were investigated. Ninety-four judicial cases were included and multiple experts and methods of estimating the PMI were found. As part of this study, the methods that were used to estimate the PMI in court were subjected to the Daubert criteria. Of these methods, only the Henssge nomogram and entomological methods met the Daubert criteria. However, the methods are only useful when applied by the right forensic expert and in the right manner. Unfortunately, this was not always the case.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101970
JournalLegal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)
Volume53
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The time of death in Dutch court; using the Daubert criteria to evaluate methods to estimate the PMI used in court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this