Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the test-retest reliability and criterion validity of the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD).
METHODS: Forty-five non-wheelchair dependent subjects were recruited from three Dutch rehabilitation centers. Subjects' diagnoses were: stroke, spinal cord injury, whiplash, and neurological-, orthopedic- or back disorders. The PASIPD is a 7-d recall physical activity questionnaire that was completed twice, 1 wk apart. During this week, physical activity was also measured with an Actigraph accelerometer.
RESULTS: The test-retest reliability Spearman correlation of the PASIPD was 0.77. The criterion validity Spearman correlation was 0.30 when compared to the accelerometer.
CONCLUSIONS: The PASIPD had test-retest reliability and criterion validity that is comparable to well established self-report physical activity questionnaires from the general population.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 96-100 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of physical activity & health |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2007 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Disabled Persons
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Motor Activity/physiology
- Reproducibility of Results
- Surveys and Questionnaires
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities: test-retest reliability and comparison with an accelerometer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver