Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The impact of an open or laparoscopic approach on the development of metachronous peritoneal metastases after primary resection of colorectal cancer: results from a population-based cohort study

  • Robin J. Lurvink
  • , Anouk Rijken
  • , Checca Bakkers
  • , Valery E. Lemmens
  • , Philip R. de Reuver
  • , Jurriaan B. Tuynman
  • , Niels F. Kok
  • , Simon W. Nienhuijs
  • , Felice N. van Erning
  • , Ignace H. J. T. de Hingh*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Catharina Hospital
  • Department of Research & Development, Netherlands
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Institute for Public Health Genomics (IPHG), Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands;
  • Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • University of Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the impact of open or laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer (CRC) on the development of metachronous colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) in a population-based cohort. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective, population-based study of CRC patients who underwent open or laparoscopic resection of the primary tumour in the Netherlands between January 1st and June 30th 2015. Patients with synchronous metastases were excluded. CPM were considered metachronous if diagnosed ≥ 90 days after resection of primary CRC. Multivariable cox regression analysis was performed to correct for tumour location, histology, differentiation, and stage, nodal stage, tumour perforation, primary surgery type, and unclear resection margins. Results: In total, 1516 CRC patients underwent open resection and 3236 CRC patients underwent laparoscopic resection, with a 3-year cumulative incidence of metachronous CPM of 7.3% and 3.7%, respectively (p < 0.001), after median follow-up of 42 months. Open surgical approach was significantly associated with the development of metachronous CPM: HR 1.4 [95%CI 1.1–1.8]. Other prognostic factors were mucinous adenocarcinoma histology (HR 1.6, 95%CI 1.0–2.5), T4 stage (HR 3.2, 95%CI 2.3–4.5), N1 stage (HR 2.9, 95%CI 2.1–4.0), and N2 stage (HR 4.2, 95%CI 2.9–6.1). Conclusions: Patients treated with open resection had a significantly higher risk to develop metachronous CPM than patients treated with laparoscopic resection. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain unknown but might be related to differences in per-operative specimen handling, tumour spill, surgical trauma and pro-inflammatory response. This finding might imply the need for a personalized follow-up after primary resection of CRC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6551-6557
Number of pages7
JournalSurgical endoscopy
Volume36
Issue number9
Early online date2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Open surgery
  • Peritoneal metastases
  • Surgical approach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of an open or laparoscopic approach on the development of metachronous peritoneal metastases after primary resection of colorectal cancer: results from a population-based cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this