Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) Scale: an international reliability and validation study

  • Gianluca Esposito*
  • , Emanuele Dilaghi
  • , Cristina Costa-Santos
  • , Irene Ligato
  • , Bruno Annibale
  • , M. rio Dinis-Ribeiro
  • , Miguel Areia
  • , Vitor N. Arantes
  • , Jacques Bergman
  • , Raf Bisschops
  • , Pieter J. F. de Jonge
  • , Francesco Di Matteo
  • , Alanna Ebigbo
  • , Monika Ferlitsch
  • , Vanja Giljaca
  • , Cesare Hassan
  • , Tomas Hucl
  • , Roman Kuvaev
  • , Philippe Leclercq
  • , Tamara Matysiak-Budnik
  • Yuichi Mori, Alan Moss, Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, Roos E. Pouw, Douglas K. Rex, Enrique Rodriguez de Santiago, Peter D. Siersema, Tony C. Tham, Konstantinos Triantafyllou, Andrei Voiosu, Bas Weusten, Gianluca Andrisani, Stefano Angeletti, Mousa Ayoub, Simon Bac, Kirsten Boonstra, Nienke Borren, Antonio Capogreco, Irene Chivato Martín Falquina, J. ssica Chaves, Nicolò Citterio, Arianna Dal Buono, Elisabetta Dell’Unto, Victor Dragan, Luís Elvas, Ksenia Filimendikova, Adrian Frick, John Guardiola, Natalie Halvorsen, Marc le Rhun, Diogo Libanio, Peter Macinga, Marco Marini, Berrie Meijer, R. bia Moresi Vianna de Oliveira, Steven Nicolaides, Olivier Plomteux, Victor Prouvost, Nikos Samarentsis, Pieter Sinonquel, Imran Tahir, Ken Tang, Elena Tenorio Gonzalez, Steffi Van de Ven, Maria Inês Viegas
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant'Andrea
  • University of Porto
  • Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil E.P.E.
  • Portuguese Oncology Institute
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • University of Amsterdam
  • KU Leuven
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital Foundation
  • University Hospital Augsburg
  • Medical University of Vienna
  • Evangelical Hospital Vienna
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
  • Humanitas University
  • Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
  • Yaroslavl Regional Cancer Hospital
  • Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
  • CHU de Nantes
  • University of Oslo
  • Western Health
  • University of Melbourne
  • Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • Hospital Ramon y Cajal
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • Colentina Hospital
  • Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
  • Utrecht University
  • Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena
  • IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
  • Hospital Mater Dei Contorno
  • Clinique CHC MontLégia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

166 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background Mucosal visualization during upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy can be impaired by the presence of foam, bubbles, and mucus. Some UGI endoscopy visibility scales have been proposed but have not undergone multicenter validation. This study aimed to develop and validate the Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) scale. Methods A multicenter, international, cross-sectional study was conducted. The GRACE scale is based on a score from 0 (worst) to 3 (excellent) for esophagus, stomach, and duodenum, for a total ranging from 0 to 9. In phase 1, four expert endoscopists evaluated 60 images twice, with a 2-week interval between rounds; in phase 2, the same 60 images were scored twice by one expert and one nonexpert endoscopist from 27 endoscopy departments worldwide. For reproducibility assessment and real-time validation, the scale was applied to consecutive patients undergoing gastroscopy at each center. Results On internal validation, interobserver agreement was 0.81 (95 %CI 0.73–0.87) and 0.80 (95 %CI 0.72–0.86), with reliability of 0.73 (95 %CI 0.63–0.82) and 0.72 (95 %CI 0.63–0.81), in the two rounds, respectively. On external validation, overall interobserver agreement was 0.85 (95 %CI 0.82–0.88) and reliability was 0.79 (95 %CI 0.73–0.84). In real-time evaluation, the overall proportion of correct classifications was 0.80 (95 %CI 0.77–0.82). Conclusions The GRACE scale showed good interobserver agreement, reliability, and validity. The widespread use of this scale could enhance quality and standardize the assessment of mucosal cleanliness during UGI endoscopy, pushing endoscopists to strive for excellent visibility and reducing the risk of missed lesions.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEndoscopy
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Gastroscopy RAte of Cleanliness Evaluation (GRACE) Scale: an international reliability and validation study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this