Abstract
In their contribution, Wiggins and Wilbanks (2019) discuss
the rise of citizen science and elaborate on several
ethical issues that go beyond standard approaches in
research ethics. They rightly say that citizen science, in
including the public in scientific research, relates to participatory
action research and action research. They
notice that this is no longer prominent in current forms
of citizen science, which focus on involving the public in
data collection and data analysis. We argue that participatory
health research (PHR), which, in terms of
Wiggins and Wilbanks (2019), emphasizes co-creation
with rather than contribution of the public, may help to
identify ethical issues that are not in the forefront, and to
find new ways of dealing with them by focusing on relationships
between citizen researchers and academic
researchers and fostering participatory reflection on
everyday ethical issues.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 23-25 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | American journal of bioethics |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 3 Aug 2019 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Ethics of Public and Service User Involvement in Health Research: The Need for Participatory Reflection on Everyday Ethical Issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver