Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effect of empagliflozin on peripheral microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

  • Sanne G. J. Mourmans
  • , Anouk Achten
  • , Raquel Hermans
  • , Marijne J. E. Scheepers
  • , Elisa D’Alessandro
  • , Geertje Swennen
  • , Janneke Woudstra
  • , Yolande Appelman
  • , Harry van Goor
  • , Casper Schalkwijk
  • , Christian Knackstedt
  • , Jerremy Weerts
  • , Etto C. Eringa
  • , Vanessa P. M. van Empel*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Maastricht University
  • Amsterdam UMC Heart Center
  • University of Groningen
  • Amsterdam UMC

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Empagliflozin is an effective treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its definite mechanism of action is unclear. Systemic microvascular dysfunction strongly relates to HFpEF aetiology, and we hypothesised that empagliflozin improves microvascular function in HFpEF. Objective: To investigate the effect of the sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor empagliflozin on peripheral microvascular function in HFpEF. Methods: This is a pre-post intervention study in patients diagnosed with HFpEF who are eligible for treatment with empagliflozin. Microvascular function assessment using laser speckle contrast analysis of the dorsal forearm during iontophoresis of vasoactive stimuli (acetylcholine, insulin sodium nitroprusside) was performed at baseline and after 3 months of empagliflozin treatment (10 mg daily). The primary outcome was the difference in blood flow measured in the forearm microvasculature between baseline and at follow-up (cutaneous vascular conductance, CVC). Secondarily we investigated quality-of-life based on the EQ-5D-5 L questionnaire at baseline and follow-up. Results: Twenty six patients finished the study according to protocol (mean age of 74 ± 7 years, 62% female). We observed a decreased blood flow response to acetylcholine after 3 months of empagliflozin (CVC: 0.77 ± 0.24 vs. 0.64 ± 0.20, p < 0.001). In contrast, the response to insulin improved (CVC: 0.61 ± 0.43 vs. 0.81 ± 0.32, p = 0.03), and the response to sodium nitroprusside remained stable after 3 months. No significant correlations were found between the changes in blood flow and quality of life. Conclusion: This study shows that three months treatment with empagliflozin changed peripheral microvascular function in patients with HFpEF. Empagliflozin may enhance microvascular blood flow specifically via vascular actions of insulin, rather than a general effect on endothelial vasoregulation or smooth muscle cell function. As such, systemic microvascular dysfunction can be a modifiable factor in patients with HFpEF, while the clinical implications thereof warrant further investigations. Trial registration: The trial was preregistered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06046612).

Original languageEnglish
Article number182
JournalCardiovascular diabetology
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Acetylcholine
  • Endothelial function
  • Heart failure
  • Insulin
  • Laser speckle contrast analysis
  • Microcirculation
  • Nitroprusside
  • SGLT-2 inhibitor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of empagliflozin on peripheral microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this