Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The combined use of steroids and immune checkpoint inhibitors in brain metastasis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Charissa A.C. Jessurun
  • , Alexander F.C. Hulsbergen
  • , Anouk E. De Wit
  • , Ishaan A. Tewarie
  • , Tom J. Snijders
  • , Joost J.C. Verhoeff
  • , John G. Phillips
  • , David A. Reardon
  • , Rania A. Mekary
  • , Marike L.D. Broekman*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center (CNOC)
  • Harvard University
  • Department of Neurosurgery
  • Leiden University
  • Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
  • Department of Psychiatry
  • University of Groningen
  • Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery
  • Utrecht University
  • Department of Radiation Oncology
  • Department of Medical Oncology
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • Department of Pharmaceutical Business and Administrative Sciences
  • Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences
  • UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been a breakthrough for selected cancer patients, including those with brain metastases (BMs). Likewise, steroids have been an integral component of symptomatic management of BM patients. However, clinical evidence on the interaction between ICI and steroids in BM patients is conflicting and has not adequately been summarized thus far. Hence, the aim of this study was to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the association between steroid use and overall survival (OS) in BM patients receiving ICI. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random-effects models across included studies. Results: After screening 1145 abstracts, 15 observational studies were included. Fourteen studies reported sufficient data for meta-analysis, comprising 1102 BM patients of which 32.1% received steroids. In the steroid group, median OS ranged from 2.9 to 10.2 months. In the nonsteroid group, median OS ranged from 4.9 to 25.1 months. Pooled results demonstrated significantly worse OS (HR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.22-2.77) and systemic progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 2.00, 95% CI 1.37-2.91) in the steroid group. Stratified analysis showed a consistent effect across the melanoma subgroup; not in the lung cancer subgroup. No significant association was shown between steroid use and intracranial PFS (HR = 1.31, 95% CI 0.42-4.07). Conclusions: Administration of steroids was associated with significantly worse OS and PFS in BM patients receiving ICI. Further research on dose, timing, and duration of steroids is needed to elucidate the cause of this association and optimize outcomes in BM patients receiving ICI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1261-1272
Number of pages12
JournalNeuro-oncology
Volume23
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • brain metastases
  • immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • meta-analysis
  • steroids
  • survival

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The combined use of steroids and immune checkpoint inhibitors in brain metastasis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this