Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The challenge of implementing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

  • Jan Deprest
  • , Ladislav Krofta
  • , Frank van der Aa
  • , Alfredo L. Milani
  • , Jan den Boon
  • , Filip Claerhout
  • , Jan-Paul Roovers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Vaginal-vault prolapse is effectively treated using sacrocolpopexy (SCP). A randomized trial demonstrated that it can be performed as effectively via laparoscopy (LSCP) as via laparotomy and with less morbidity. This evidence begs the question of how units offering abdominal sacrocolpopexy will implement LSCP. Several limitations need to be overcome. LSCP initially requires longer operating time; however, that decreases with surgeon experience. To decrease operation time, suture training can be implemented ahead. Following a 15-h suturing lab, trainees achieved comparable operation times after 30 cases. Dissection is another critical time-consuming step and is difficult to model. Proficiency is more dependent on patient characteristics, though this component is poorly studied. One experience showed it takes 60 procedures to effectively limit complications. The large number of patients required for surgeon training for this relative infrequent operation creates a problem, thus limiting the number of centers available for training surgeons within a reasonable period
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1153-1160
JournalInternational urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The challenge of implementing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this