Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Textbook Oncological Outcome in European GASTRODATA

  • Katarzyna Sędłak
  • , Karol Rawicz-Pruszyński
  • , Radosław Mlak
  • , Johanna van Sandick
  • , Suzanne Gisbertz
  • , Manuel Pera
  • , Mariagiulia Dal Cero
  • , Gian Luca Baiocchi
  • , Andrea Celotti
  • , Paolo Morgagni
  • , Giovani Vittimberga
  • , Arnulf Hoelscher
  • , Stefan Moenig
  • , Piotr Kołodziejczyk
  • , Piotr Richter
  • , Ines Gockel
  • , Guillaume Piessen
  • , Paulo Matos da Costa
  • , Andrew Davies
  • , Cara Baker
  • William Allum, Uberto Fumagalli Romario, Stefano de Pascale, Ricccardo Rosati, Daniel Reim, Lucio Lara Santos, Domenico D'ugo, Bas Wijnhoven, Maurizio Degiuli, Giovanni de Manzoni, Wojciech Kielan, Ewelina Frejlich, Paul Schneider, Wojciech P. Polkowski
  • Medical University of Lublin
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Hospital del Mar
  • University of Brescia
  • Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital
  • Markus-Krankenhaus Frankfurt
  • Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland
  • Leipzig University
  • Université de Lille
  • Hospital Garcia de Orta
  • Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
  • Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - Milano
  • Viral Evolution and Transmission Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
  • Technical University of Munich
  • Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil E.P.E.
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
  • Erasmus MC
  • University of Turin
  • University of Verona
  • Wrocław Medical University
  • Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Berlin
  • 1st Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
  • University of Lille
  • Guy’s Hospital
  • From the Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience (P.P.), and Neurology Unite (P.P.), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; and Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences (M.M.S.), MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

144 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of textbook outcome (TO) and textbook oncological outcome (TOO) in the European population based on the GASTRODATA registry. BACKGROUND: TO is a composite parameter assessing surgical quality and strongly correlates with improved overall survival. Following the standard of treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer, TOO was proposed as a quality and optimal multimodal treatment parameter. METHODS: TO was achieved when all the following criteria were met: no intraoperative complications, radical resection according to the surgeon, pR0 resection, retrieval of at least 15 lymph nodes, no severe postoperative complications, no reintervention, no admission to the intensive care unit, no prolonged length of stay, no postoperative mortality and no hospital readmission. TOO was defined as TO with the addition of perioperative chemotherapy compliance. RESULTS: Of the 2558 patients, 1700 were included in the analysis. TO was achieved in 1164 (68.5%) patients. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy [odds ratio (OR) = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04-1.70] and D2 or D2+ lymphadenectomy (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.15-2.10) had a positive impact on TO achievement. Older age (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.54-0.94), pT3/4 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63-0.99), ASA 3/4 (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.86) and total gastrectomy (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.45-0.70), had a negative impact on TO achievement. TOO was achieved in 388 (22.8%) patients. Older age (OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.53), pT3 or pT4 (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39-0.69), and ASA 3 or 4 (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.43-0.79) had a negative impact on TOO achievement. CONCLUSIONS: Despite successively improved surgical outcomes, stage-appropriate chemotherapy in adherence to the current guidelines for multimodal treatment of gastric cancer remains poor. Further implementation of oncologic quality metrics should include greater emphasis on perioperative chemotherapy and adequate lymphadenectomy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)823-831
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume278
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • gastric cancer
  • neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • textbook outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Textbook Oncological Outcome in European GASTRODATA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this