Abstract
Written texts are an important medium for evaluators to communicate their findings. Evaluation reports take many forms and functions, commonly having the character of a scientific text. An objective and factual description informs readers about the activities and outcomes of the program and its underlying mechanisms. In this article I suggest that a scientific text can be useful when an evaluation aims to determine the worth of a program. However, if the goal of evaluation is to promote a dialogue among those who have an interest in the evaluated program a different kind of text is required. In my attempt to identify an appropriate text for such a purpose I describe and apply the notions of texts developed by postmodern writers self-reflexivity, polyvocality and multiplicityin an evaluative context. The potential of this kind of text is illustrated and critically examined by the responsive evaluation of a Palliative Care project.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 434-454 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Evaluation |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 1998 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Text in an evaluative context:Writing for dialogue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver