TY - JOUR
T1 - Survival outcomes with carboplatin versus cisplatin and the impact of COVID-19 on platinum choice
T2 - A nationwide Netherlands registry study in small cell lung cancer patients (CACIS)
AU - Houda, Ilias
AU - Naves, Dwayne
AU - Ulas, Ezgi B.
AU - Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
AU - Barlo, Nicole P.
AU - Kastelijn, Elisabeth A.
AU - Bouhaddou, Hicham
AU - Shaikh, Rimsha
AU - Dickhoff, Chris
AU - Radonic, Teodora
AU - Schneiders, Famke L.
AU - Senan, Suresh
AU - Damhuis, Ronald A. M.
AU - Bahce, Idris
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/11/17
Y1 - 2025/11/17
N2 - Background: Guidelines recommend cisplatin as the preferred platinum agent in the first-line treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), especially limited-stage disease (LS-SCLC). However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, carboplatin use likely increased due to logistical advantages. We evaluated the pandemic's impact on platinum agent utilization in the Netherlands and compared overall survival (OS) and safety between cisplatin and carboplatin. Methods: Using Netherlands Cancer Registry data, first-line platinum-based treatments for LS-SCLC and extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed. OS was evaluated using univariable and multivariable analyses. Grades 3–5 treatment-related adverse events were studied in three hospitals. Findings: Overall, 1683 LS-SCLC (carboplatin, N = 1011[60 %]; cisplatin, N = 672[40 %]) and 3668 ES-SCLC (carboplatin, N = 3002[82 %]; cisplatin, N = 666[18 %]) patients were included. During the pandemic, quarterly usage rates of carboplatin reached up to 81 % and 90 % in LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC, respectively. In LS-SCLC, univariable analysis showed significantly shorter median OS with carboplatin compared to cisplatin (17.9m vs. 26.3m; HR, 1.48; 95 %CI, 1.31–1.68; p < 0.001). Similar findings were observed in ES-SCLC (8.0m vs. 9.3m; HR, 1.19; 95 %CI, 1.09–1.30; p < 0.001). However, multivariable analyses, after adjusting for confounders, showed no significant OS differences in either LS-SCLC (HR, 1.06; 95 %CI, 0.90–1.25; p = 0.463) or ES-SCLC (HR, 1.01; 95 %CI, 0.92–1.12; p = 0.785). Confounders were performance status (PS), age, sex, and chemoradiotherapy type for LS-SCLC, and PS, age, sex, stage, and liver metastases for ES-SCLC. Hematologic toxicity was higher with carboplatin, while cisplatin led to more nonhematologic toxicity. Interpretation: These findings challenge the long-standing belief of cisplatin's superiority and support the adoption of carboplatin in SCLC.
AB - Background: Guidelines recommend cisplatin as the preferred platinum agent in the first-line treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), especially limited-stage disease (LS-SCLC). However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, carboplatin use likely increased due to logistical advantages. We evaluated the pandemic's impact on platinum agent utilization in the Netherlands and compared overall survival (OS) and safety between cisplatin and carboplatin. Methods: Using Netherlands Cancer Registry data, first-line platinum-based treatments for LS-SCLC and extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed. OS was evaluated using univariable and multivariable analyses. Grades 3–5 treatment-related adverse events were studied in three hospitals. Findings: Overall, 1683 LS-SCLC (carboplatin, N = 1011[60 %]; cisplatin, N = 672[40 %]) and 3668 ES-SCLC (carboplatin, N = 3002[82 %]; cisplatin, N = 666[18 %]) patients were included. During the pandemic, quarterly usage rates of carboplatin reached up to 81 % and 90 % in LS-SCLC and ES-SCLC, respectively. In LS-SCLC, univariable analysis showed significantly shorter median OS with carboplatin compared to cisplatin (17.9m vs. 26.3m; HR, 1.48; 95 %CI, 1.31–1.68; p < 0.001). Similar findings were observed in ES-SCLC (8.0m vs. 9.3m; HR, 1.19; 95 %CI, 1.09–1.30; p < 0.001). However, multivariable analyses, after adjusting for confounders, showed no significant OS differences in either LS-SCLC (HR, 1.06; 95 %CI, 0.90–1.25; p = 0.463) or ES-SCLC (HR, 1.01; 95 %CI, 0.92–1.12; p = 0.785). Confounders were performance status (PS), age, sex, and chemoradiotherapy type for LS-SCLC, and PS, age, sex, stage, and liver metastases for ES-SCLC. Hematologic toxicity was higher with carboplatin, while cisplatin led to more nonhematologic toxicity. Interpretation: These findings challenge the long-standing belief of cisplatin's superiority and support the adoption of carboplatin in SCLC.
KW - Adult
KW - Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
KW - COVID-19
KW - Carboplatin
KW - Chemoradiotherapy
KW - Cisplatin
KW - Lung Neoplasms
KW - Registries
KW - Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
KW - Survival Analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018003688
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116042
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.116042
M3 - Article
C2 - 41061426
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 230
JO - Eur. J. Cancer
JF - Eur. J. Cancer
M1 - 116042
ER -