Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Survey on current cognitive practices within the European Low-Grade Glioma Network: towards a European assessment protocol

  • Adrià Rofes*
  • , Emmanuel Mandonnet
  • , John Godden
  • , Marie Hélène Baron
  • , Henry Colle
  • , Amelie Darlix
  • , Vânia de Aguiar
  • , Hugues Duffau
  • , Guillaume Herbet
  • , Martin Klein
  • , Vincent Lubrano
  • , Juan Martino
  • , Ryan Mathew
  • , Gabriele Miceli
  • , Sylvie Moritz-Gasser
  • , Johan Pallud
  • , Costanza Papagno
  • , Fabien Rech
  • , Erik Robert
  • , Geert Jan Rutten
  • Thomas Santarius, Djaina Satoer, Joanna Sierpowska, Anja Smits, Miran Skrap, Giannantonio Spena, Evy Visch, Elke De Witte, Maria Zetterling, Michel Wager
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Trinity College Dublin
  • Université Paris 7
  • IMNC UMR8165
  • Leeds General Infirmary
  • Université de Franche-Comté
  • AZ Sint-Lucas and AZ Maria Middelares
  • Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier INSERM U 89
  • Université de Montpellier 2
  • CHU de Toulouse
  • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
  • University of Trento
  • Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne
  • Université Paris 5
  • Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
  • University of Milan - Bicocca
  • CHU de Nancy
  • ETZ Elisabeth
  • University of Cambridge
  • Erasmus University Medical Center
  • University of Barcelona
  • Uppsala University
  • University of Gothenburg
  • University of Udine
  • University of Brescia
  • Free Universities of Brussels
  • CHU de Poitiers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The European Low-Grade Glioma network indicated a need to better understand common practices regarding the managing of diffuse low-grade gliomas. This area has experienced great advances in recent years. Method: A general survey on the managing of diffuse low-grade gliomas was answered by 21 centres in 11 European countries. Here we focused on specific questions regarding perioperative and intraoperative cognitive assessments. Results: More centres referred to the same speech and language therapist and/or neuropsychologist across all assessments; a core of assessment tools was routinely used across centres; fluency tasks were commonly used in the perioperative stages, and object naming during surgery; tasks that tapped on attention, executive functions, visuospatial awareness, calculation and emotions were sparsely administered; preoperative assessments were performed 1 month or 1 week before surgery; timing for postoperative assessments varied; finally, more centres recommended early rehabilitation, whenever needed. Conclusions: There is an emerging trend towards following similar practices for the management of low-grade gliomas in Europe. Our results are descriptive and formalise current discussions in our group. Also, they contribute towards the development of a European assessment protocol.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1167-1178
Number of pages12
JournalActa neurochirurgica
Volume159
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Cognition
  • Diffuse low-grade glioma
  • Protocol
  • Surgery
  • Survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Survey on current cognitive practices within the European Low-Grade Glioma Network: towards a European assessment protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this