Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Surgical Complications for Oral Cavity Cancer: Evaluating Hospital Performance

  • Hanneke Doremiek van Oorschot*
  • , Jose Angelito Hardillo
  • , Robert J. J. van Es
  • , Guido B. van den Broek
  • , Robert Paul Takes
  • , Gyorgy Bela Halmos
  • , Dominique Valerie Clarence de Jel
  • , Richard Dirven
  • , Martin Lacko
  • , Lauretta Anna Alexandra Vaassen
  • , Jan-Jaap Hendrickx
  • , Marjolijn Abigal Eva-Maria Oomens
  • , Hossein Ghaeminia
  • , Jeroen C. Jansen
  • , Annemarie Vesseur
  • , Rolf Bun
  • , Leonora Q. Schwandt
  • , Christiaan A. Krabbe
  • , Thomas J. W. Klein Nulent
  • , Reinoud J. Klijn
  • Alexander J. M. van Bemmel, Robert Jan Baatenburg de Jong
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Scientific Bureau
  • Utrecht University
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • University of Groningen
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Maastricht University
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Rijnstate Hospital
  • Leiden University
  • ETZ Elisabeth
  • Dijklander Hospital
  • Medical Centre Leeuwarden
  • Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: Complications of oral cavity cancer (OCC) surgery have an impact on the quality of life. Therefore, evaluating hospital performance on complication rates can help identify best practices for improving the quality of OCC care. As patient and tumor characteristics also impact hospital results, case-mix adjustment should be considered to provide a valid hospital comparison. This study investigated hospital variation in the quality indicator “a complicated postoperative course” after OCC surgery. Methods: This population-based cohort included all first primary OCC patients diagnosed between 2018 and 2021 who were surgically treated with curative intent. A complicated postoperative course was defined as 30-day mortality, unplanned readmission, surgical complications requiring reintervention or prolonged hospital stay, or fistula formation. Hospital performance was analyzed using funnel plots with case-mix correction. Results: A total of 2,266 OCC patients could be included. The distribution of case-mix variables varied significantly between hospital populations. Nationally, a complicated postoperative course occurred in 13.9% and uncorrected hospital rates ranged from 2.7% to 31.1%. A WHO performance score ≥2, cT3-T4 tumors, and floor-of-mouth tumors were associated with an increased risk of a complicated postoperative course, and non-squamous cell carcinoma with a decreased risk. Significant outliers remained after case-mix correction for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Conclusion: Complications after OCC surgery are prevalent, especially regarding extensive tumors and surgery. To identify best practices in OCC surgery, hospital performance on a complicated postoperative course should be adjusted for case-mix and treatment variables. Providing feedback on hospital performance for complications can instigate improvement plans for better outcomes. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 135:2411–2419, 2025.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2411-2419
Number of pages9
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume135
Issue number7
Early online date2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • clinical auditing
  • head and neck cancer
  • hospital variation
  • oral cavity cancer surgical complications

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical Complications for Oral Cavity Cancer: Evaluating Hospital Performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this