Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sudden cardiac death in congenital heart disease

  • Paul Khairy
  • , Michael J. Silka
  • , Jeremy P. Moore
  • , James A. DiNardo
  • , Jim T. Vehmeijer
  • , Mary N. Sheppard
  • , Alexander van de Bruaene
  • , Marie-A. Chaix
  • , Margarita Brida
  • , Benjamin M. Moore
  • , Maully J. Shah
  • , Blandine Mondésert
  • , Seshadri Balaji
  • , Michael A. Gatzoulis
  • , Magalie Ladouceur
  • University of Montreal
  • University of Southern California
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Harvard University
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • St. George's University of London
  • KU Leuven
  • University of Zagreb
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Université Paris Cité

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

220 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for up to 25% of deaths in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). To date, research has largely been driven by observational studies and real-world experience. Drawbacks include varying definitions, incomplete taxonomy that considers SCD as a unitary diagnosis as opposed to a terminal event with diverse causes, inconsistent outcome ascertainment, and limited data granularity. Notwithstanding these constraints, identified higher-risk substrates include tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, cyanotic heart disease, Ebstein anomaly, and Fontan circulation. Without autopsies, it is often impossible to distinguish SCD from non-cardiac sudden deaths. Asystole and pulseless electrical activity account for a high proportion of SCDs, particularly in patients with heart failure. High-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation is essential to improve outcomes. Pulmonary hypertension and CHD complexity are associated with lower likelihood of successful resuscitation. Risk stratification for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) should consider the probability of SCD due to a shockable rhythm, competing causes of mortality, complications of ICD therapy, and associated costs. Risk scores to better estimate probabilities of SCD and CHD-specific guidelines and consensus-based recommendations have been proposed. The subcutaneous ICD has emerged as an attractive alternative to transvenous systems in those with vascular access limitations, prior device infections, intra-cardiac shunts, or a Fontan circulation. Further improving SCD-related outcomes will require a multidimensional approach to research that addresses disease processes and triggers, taxonomy to better reflect underlying pathophysiology, high-risk features, early warning signs, access to high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation and specialized care, and preventive therapies tailored to underlying mechanisms.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2103-2115
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean heart journal
Volume43
Issue number22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jun 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Cardiac arrest
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
  • Risk stratification
  • Sudden cardiac death

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sudden cardiac death in congenital heart disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this