Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Standardization of in vivo and in vitro diagnostic procedures in food allergy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

For most foods, true standardization is not yet feasible because there is insufficient information on the relative importance of individual allergens and their variants. Standardization without sufficient information may easily be counterproductive because improvements are less likely to be implemented. In the analysis of natural test material, the following principles apply: 1) RAST inhibition is usually inferior to other means of allergen quantitation. 2) Immunoblot is inefficient for some "important" allergens and overefficient for some "unimportant" allergens and may therefore be deceptive. 3) Single-component assays are the only satisfactory way to describe complex mixtures. Improving the actual food-testing procedure is important, but will not alone result in a reliable diagnostic procedure. Tests for measuring "effect modifiers" will have to be developed in order to predict in vivo reactions to foods
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)62-64
JournalAllergy
Volume53
Issue number46 Suppl
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standardization of in vivo and in vitro diagnostic procedures in food allergy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this