Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Standard setting in occupational health: “Philosophical” issues

  • Reinier L. Zielhuis*
  • , Anton A. E. Wibowo
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/Letter to the editorAcademic

Abstract

This paper discusses various “philosophical” issues in standard setting in occupational and environmental health, i.e., general principles, actual procedures for standard setting, inter‐ and intra‐agency discrepancies in procedures and criteria, and choices and decisions in the preparation of criteria documents and in the evaluation of the toxicology databases. Unpublished, possibly confidential information should be made available to expert committees, workers, and the general public. There is an urgent need to improve the validity of the toxicology databases that have to underpin occupational and environmental exposure limits. Standard setting requires various ethically loaded choices and decisions by experts, employees, managers, government officials, and politicians. Copyright © 1989 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)569-598
JournalAmerican journal of industrial medicine
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Standard setting in occupational health: “Philosophical” issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this