Abstract
This paper discusses various “philosophical” issues in standard setting in occupational and environmental health, i.e., general principles, actual procedures for standard setting, inter‐ and intra‐agency discrepancies in procedures and criteria, and choices and decisions in the preparation of criteria documents and in the evaluation of the toxicology databases. Unpublished, possibly confidential information should be made available to expert committees, workers, and the general public. There is an urgent need to improve the validity of the toxicology databases that have to underpin occupational and environmental exposure limits. Standard setting requires various ethically loaded choices and decisions by experts, employees, managers, government officials, and politicians. Copyright © 1989 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 569-598 |
| Journal | American journal of industrial medicine |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 1989 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Standard setting in occupational health: “Philosophical” issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver