Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Stacked Biocomposite Screws in a Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Has Acceptable Fixation Strength in a Porcine Cadaveric Model

  • Hasan Baydoun
  • , Ian D Engler
  • , Ali Hosseini
  • , Lance LeClere
  • , Joeri Zoon
  • , Luciano Zoon
  • , Guoan Li
  • , Matthew J Salzler
  • , Thomas J Gill
  • Division of Infectious Diseases, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
  • Tufts Medical Center
  • Harvard
  • United States Naval Academy
  • Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Neurosurgical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering & Physics AUMC...
  • Orthopaedic Bioengineering Research Center
  • Department of Pathology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Jaharis Bldg., 150 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111, USA.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stacked screws is a commonly used technique in single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the setting of bone loss, but there are limited data to support its use.

HYPOTHESIS: Two configurations of a biocomposite stacked screws construct have similar fixation strength and linear stiffness as a primary ACL reconstruction construct in a biomechanical model.

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS: A total of 30 porcine legs were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 underwent primary ACL reconstruction with a patellar tendon graft fixed into the femur, with an 8-mm biocomposite interference screw of beta-tricalcium phosphate and poly lactide-co-glycolide. For a revision ACL reconstruction model, groups 2 and 3 had bone tunnels created and subsequently filled with 12-mm biocomposite screws. New bone tunnels were drilled through the filler screw and the surrounding bone, and the patellar bone plug was inserted. Group 2 was fixed with 8-mm biocomposite screws on the side of the graft opposite the filler screw, while group 3 had the interference screw interposed between the graft and the filler screw. The construct was loaded at 1.5 mm/s in line with the tunnel until failure. Load to failure, linear stiffness, and mode of failure were recorded.

RESULTS: The mean pullout strength for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 626 ± 145 N, 653 ± 152 N, and 720 ± 125 N, respectively (P = .328). The mean linear stiffness of the construct in groups 1, 2, and 3 was 71.4 ± 9.9 N/mm, 84.1 ± 11.1 N/mm, and 82.0 ± 10.8 N/mm, respectively. Group 2 was significantly stiffer than group 1 (P = .037).

CONCLUSION: Two configurations of a biocomposite stacked screws construct for a single-stage revision ACL reconstruction in the setting of bone loss show a similar fixation strength and linear stiffness to a primary ACL reconstruction at time zero in a porcine model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In the setting of bone loss from tunnel malpositioning, a single-stage revision ACL reconstruction using a stacked screws construct may provide adequate fixation strength and linear stiffness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2144-2149
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican journal of sports medicine
Volume49
Issue number8
Early online date28 May 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

Keywords

  • anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
  • biomechanics
  • bone loss
  • revision
  • stacked screws
  • tunnel malposition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stacked Biocomposite Screws in a Single-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Has Acceptable Fixation Strength in a Porcine Cadaveric Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this