Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

SMART Stone Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) and patient care: recommendations for the adult high-risk kidney stone patient pathway

  • Bhaskar Somani*
  • , Esteban Emiliani
  • , Thomas Knoll
  • , Giorgia Mandrile
  • , Gill Rumsby
  • , Cecile Acquaviva
  • , Naeem Bhojani
  • , Saeed Bin Hamri
  • , Ewa Bres-Niewada
  • , Niall F. Davis
  • , Daniel G. Fuster
  • , Sander F. Garrelfs
  • , Vineet Gauhar
  • , Shuzo Hamamoto
  • , Patrick Juliebø-Jones
  • , Marta Leporati
  • , Emmanuel Letavernier
  • , Tatsuya Takayama
  • , Lazaros Tzelves
  • , Steffi Kar Kei Yuen
  • Pietro Manuel Ferraro
*Corresponding author for this work
  • SMART Stone Steering Committee
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • New York University
  • University Medicine Mannheim
  • Azienda Ospedaliera S. Luigi Gonzaga
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Hospices civils de Lyon
  • Centre Hospitalier de L'Universite de Montreal
  • King Abdulaziz Medical City - Riyadh
  • Lazarski University
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
  • University of Bern
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Ng Teng Fong General Hospital
  • Nagoya City University
  • University of Bergen
  • Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I
  • Sorbonne Université
  • International University of Health and Welfare
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • University of Verona

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: The SMART Stone Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) recommendations aim to provide guidance on the role of the MDT in the early identification, referral and assessment of adult high-risk recurrent kidney stone formers to advance patient care. Methods: Recommendations were developed by the expert Steering Committee (SC) comprising of three Urologists, one Nephrologist, and two Biochemists/Geneticists from the UK, Spain, Germany, and Italy. These recommendations were voted on by invited specialists via an online survey to determine their level of agreement, from ‘strongly agree’ to ‘strongly disagree’. With an agreement threshold set at ≥ 70%, the SC reviewed the survey results, additional comments, and any areas of disagreement before finalizing the recommendations. Results: A total of 44 recommendations were developed by the SC designed to support the set-up of an ideal MDT. Thirteen core recommendations were chosen as being highest priority and were voted on by 29 invited specialists from 19 countries across Europe, Canada, East Asia, South/Southeast Asia, and the Middle East. All 13 core recommendations reached the ≥ 70% agreement threshold. The remaining 31 recommendations were voted on by those specialists who opted-in to partake in the extended questionnaire. Fifteen specialists provided their responses from 14 different countries. All 31 recommendations reached the ≥ 70% agreement threshold. Conclusions: An ideal MDT process can achieve comprehensive, high-quality, and coordinated patient care, which is especially useful for patients with complex stone diseases. A high level of agreement was reached in areas relating to the implementation of an ideal MDT in identifying high-risk stone formers.
Original languageEnglish
Article number240
JournalWorld journal of urology
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Complex stone disease
  • Consensus
  • High-risk kidney stone
  • Multidisciplinary team
  • Patient care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'SMART Stone Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) and patient care: recommendations for the adult high-risk kidney stone patient pathway'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this