Abstract
This was a head-to-head comparative study on different electrocardiogram (ECG)-based smartwatches and devices for atrial fibrillation detection. We prospectively included 220 patients scheduled for electrical cardioversion and recorded ECGs with 3 different devices (Withings Move ECG, Apple Watch 5, Kardia Mobile 6-leads) as well as the standard 12-lead ECG (gold standard), both before and after cardioversion. All atrial fibrillation detection algorithms had high accuracy (sensitivity and specificity: 91–99%) but were hampered by uninterpretable recordings (20–24%). In cardiologists’ interpretation, the 6-lead device was superior (sensitivity 99%, specificity 97%) to both single-lead smartwatches (P < .05) for atrial fibrillation detection.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 53-58 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | American heart journal |
| Volume | 253 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2022 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Six-lead device superior to single-lead smartwatch ECG in atrial fibrillation detection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver