Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Should secondary pharmacogenomic variants be actively screened and reported when diagnostic genome-wide sequencing is performed in a child?

  • Jan M. Friedman*
  • , Yvonne Bombard
  • , Bruce Carleton
  • , Amalia M. Issa
  • , Bartha Knoppers
  • , Sharon E. Plon
  • , Vasiliki Rahimzadeh
  • , Mary V. Relling
  • , Marc S. Williams
  • , Clara van Karnebeek
  • , Danya Vears
  • , Global Alliance for Genomics and Health Regulatory and Ethics Workstream
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Toronto
  • Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • Personalized Precision Medicine & Targeted Therapeutics
  • University of Sciences in Philadelphia
  • McGill University
  • Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre, Montreal, QC, H3A 0G4, Canada
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • St. Jude Children Research Hospital
  • Geisinger
  • United for Metabolic Diseases (UMD), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • University of Melbourne
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute
  • Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam
  • Centre for Mobility and Health
  • Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation
  • University of McGill Genome Center, Montreal, QC, H3A 0G1, Canada
  • Academic Medical Centre (AMC)
  • United for Metabolic Diseases
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • University of Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This white paper was prepared by the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health Regulatory and Ethics Work Stream's Pediatric Task Team to review and provide perspective with respect to ethical, legal, and social issues regarding the return of secondary pharmacogenomic variants in children who have a serious disease or developmental disorder and are undergoing exome or genome sequencing to identify a genetic cause of their condition. We discuss actively searching for and reporting pharmacogenetic/genomic variants in pediatric patients, different methods of returning secondary pharmacogenomic findings to the patient/parents and/or treating clinicians, maintaining these data in the patient's health record over time, decision supports to assist using pharmacogenetic results in future treatment decisions, and sharing information in public databases to improve the clinical interpretation of pharmacogenetic variants identified in other children. We conclude by presenting a series of points to consider for clinicians and policymakers regarding whether, and under what circumstances, routine screening and return of pharmacogenomic variants unrelated to the indications for testing is appropriate in children who are undergoing genome-wide sequencing to assist in the diagnosis of a suspected genetic disease.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101033
JournalGenetics in medicine
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2024

Keywords

  • Exome sequencing
  • Genome sequencing
  • Pharmacogenetics
  • Pharmacogenomics
  • Secondary findings

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should secondary pharmacogenomic variants be actively screened and reported when diagnostic genome-wide sequencing is performed in a child?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this