Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sex differences in treatment allocation and survival of potentially curable gastroesophageal cancer: A population-based study

  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Department of Research & Development, Netherlands
  • University of Lausanne
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Bielefeld University
  • Erasmus MC
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation
  • Lausanne University Hospital
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Although curative treatment options are identical for male and female gastroesophageal cancer patients, access to care and survival may vary. This study aimed to compare treatment allocation and survival between male and female patients with potentially curable gastroesophageal cancer. Methods: Nationwide cohort study including all patients with potentially curable gastroesophageal squamous cell or adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2006 and 2018 registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The main outcome, treatment allocation, was compared between male and female patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). Additionally, 5-year relative survival with relative excess risk (RER), that is, adjusted for the normal life expectancy, was compared. Results: Among 27,496 patients (68.8% men), most were allocated to curative treatment (62.8%), although rates dropped to 45.6%>70 years. Curative treatment rates were comparable among younger male and female patients (≤70 years) with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, while older females with EAC were less frequently allocated to curative treatment than males (OR = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73–0.99). For those allocated to curative treatment, relative survival was superior for female patients with EAC (RER = 0.88, 95% CI 0.80–0.96) and ESCC (RER = 0.82, 95% CI 0.75–0.91), and comparable for males and females with GAC (RER = 1.02, 95% CI 0.94–1.11). Conclusions: While curative treatment rates were comparable between younger male and female patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, treatment disparities were present between older patients. When treated, the survival of females with EAC and ESCC was superior to males. The treatment and survival gaps between male and female patients with gastroesophageal cancer warrant further exploration and could potentially improve treatment strategies and survival.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-123
Number of pages10
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume187
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • Oesophageal cancer
  • Sex
  • Surgery
  • Survival

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex differences in treatment allocation and survival of potentially curable gastroesophageal cancer: A population-based study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this