Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Second-Line Treatment Options in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Report From an International Experts Panel Meeting of the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology

  • Cesare Gridelli*
  • , Paul Baas
  • , Fabrice Barlesi
  • , Fortunato Ciardiello
  • , Lucio Crinò
  • , Enriqueta Felip
  • , Shirish Gadgeel
  • , Vali Papadimitrakopoulou
  • , Luis Paz-Ares
  • , David Planchard
  • , Maurice Perol
  • , Nasser Hanna
  • , Assunta Sgambato
  • , Francesca Casaluce
  • , Filippo de Marinis
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Azienda Ospedaliera S.G. Moscati
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Aix-Marseille Université
  • University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
  • IRCCS Istituto scientifico romagnolo per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Meldola (FC)
  • Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology
  • University of Michigan Medical School
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • Centre Léon Bérard
  • Indiana University Bloomington
  • IRCCS Istituto Europeo di Oncologia - Milano

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients inevitably progress to first-line therapy and further active treatments are warranted. In the past few years, new second-line therapies, beyond chemotherapy agents, have become available in clinical practice. To date, several options for the second-line treatment of non–oncogene-addicted NSCLC patients ranging from chemotherapy in combination with antivascular endothelial growth factor receptor to immunotherapeutics are available. In oncogene-driven tumors, the better knowledge of mechanisms of acquired resistance to earlier tyrosine kinase inhibitors is leading to novel active inhibitors now available/in development. The second-line algorithm treatment of NSCLC becomes very intricate and the selection of proper patients with one of the new available therapeutic options is of paramount importance to personalize and optimize the treatment. In this review we discuss the second-line treatment opportunities of addicted as well as not-addicted NSCLC.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-314
JournalClinical lung cancer
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Second-Line Treatment Options in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Report From an International Experts Panel Meeting of the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this