Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy

  • Cristiano Spada
  • , Cesare Hassan
  • , Miguel Munoz-Navas
  • , Horst Neuhaus
  • , Jacques Deviere
  • , Paul Fockens
  • , Emmanuel Coron
  • , Gerard Gay
  • , Ervin Toth
  • , Maria Elena Riccioni
  • , Cristina Carretero
  • , Jean P. Charton
  • , Andrè van Gossum
  • , Carolien A. Wientjes
  • , Sylvie Sacher-Huvelin
  • , Michel Delvaux
  • , Artur Nemeth
  • , Lucio Petruzziello
  • , Cesar Prieto de Frias
  • , Rupert Mayershofer
  • Leila Amininejad, Leila Aminejab, Evelien Dekker, Jean-Paul Galmiche, Muriel Frederic, Gabriele Wurm Johansson, Paola Cesaro, Guido Costamagna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) represents a noninvasive technology that allows visualization of the colon without requiring sedation and air insufflation. A second-generation colon capsule endoscopy system (PillCam Colon 2) (CCE-2) was developed to increase sensitivity for colorectal polyp detection compared with the first-generation system. To assess the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of CCE-2 in a head-to-head comparison with colonoscopy. Prospective, multicenter trial including 8 European sites. This study involved 117 patients (mean age 60 years). Data from 109 patients were analyzed. CCE-2 was prospectively compared with conventional colonoscopy as the criterion standard for the detection of colorectal polyps that are ≥6 mm or masses in a cohort of patients at average or increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. Colonoscopy was independently performed within 10 hours after capsule ingestion or on the next day. CCE-2 sensitivity and specificity for detecting patients with polyps ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm were assessed. Capsule-positive but colonoscopy-negative cases were counted as false positive. Capsule excretion rate, level of bowel preparation, and rate of adverse events also were assessed. Per-patient CCE-2 sensitivity for polyps ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm was 84% and 88%, with specificities of 64% and 95%, respectively. All 3 invasive carcinomas were detected by CCE-2. The capsule excretion rate was 88% within 10 hours. Overall colon cleanliness for CCE-2 was adequate in 81% of patients. Not unblinding the CCE-2 results at colonoscopy; heterogenous patient population; nonconsecutive patients. In this European, multicenter study, CCE-2 appeared to have a high sensitivity for the detection of clinically relevant polypoid lesions, and it might be considered an adequate tool for colorectal imaging
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)581-589.e1
JournalGastrointestinal endoscopy
Volume74
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this