Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety and Efficiency of Diagnostic Strategies for Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Clinically Relevant Patient Subgroups A Systematic Review and Individual-Patient Data Meta-analysis

  • Milou A. M. Stals
  • , Toshihiko Takada
  • , Noémie Kraaijpoel
  • , Nick van Es
  • , Harry R. Büller
  • , D. Mark Courtney
  • , Yonathan Freund
  • , Javier Galipienzo
  • , Grégoire le Gal
  • , Waleed Ghanima
  • , Menno V. Huisman
  • , Jeffrey A. Kline
  • , Karel G. M. Moons
  • , Sameer Parpia
  • , Arnaud Perrier
  • , Marc Righini
  • , Helia Robert-Ebadi
  • , Pierre-Marie Roy
  • , Maarten van Smeden
  • , Phil S. Wells
  • Kerstin de Wit, Geert-Jan Geersing, Frederikus A. Klok*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Fukushima Medical University
  • University of Texas at Dallas
  • Sorbonne Université
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of Oslo
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
  • McMaster University
  • University of Geneva
  • Université d'Angers
  • Queen's University Kingston

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: How diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) perform in relevant patient subgroups defined by sex, age, cancer, and previous venous thromboembolism (VTE) is unknown. Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of the Wells and revised Geneva scores combined with fixed and adapted D-dimer thresholds, as well as the YEARS algorithm, for ruling out acute PE in these subgroups. Data Sources: MEDLINE from 1 January 1995 until 1 January 2021. Study Selection: 16 studies assessing at least 1 diagnostic strategy. Data Extraction: Individual-patient data from 20 553 patients. Data Synthesis: Safety was defined as the diagnostic failure rate (the predicted 3-month VTE incidence after exclusion of PE without imaging at baseline). Efficiency was defined as the proportion of individuals classified by the strategy as "PE considered excluded" without imaging tests. Across all strategies, efficiency was highest in patients younger than 40 years (47% to 68%) and lowest in patients aged 80 years or older (6.0% to 23%) or patients with cancer (9.6% to 26%). However, efficiency improved considerably in these subgroups when pretest probability- dependent D-dimer thresholds were applied. Predicted failure rates were highest for strategies with adapted D-dimer thresholds, with failure rates varying between 2% and 4% in the predefined patient subgroups. Limitations: Between-study differences in scoring predictor items and D-dimer assays, as well as the presence of differential verification bias, in particular for classifying fatal events and subsegmental PE cases, all of which may have led to an overestimation of the predicted failure rates of adapted D-dimer thresholds. Conclusion: Overall, all strategies showed acceptable safety, with pretest probability-dependent D-dimer thresholds having not only the highest efficiency but also the highest predicted failure rate. From an efficiency perspective, this individualpatient data meta-analysis supports application of adapted Ddimer thresholds.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)244-255
Number of pages12
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume175
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and Efficiency of Diagnostic Strategies for Ruling Out Pulmonary Embolism in Clinically Relevant Patient Subgroups A Systematic Review and Individual-Patient Data Meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this