Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety and efficacy of different P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndromes stratified by the PRAISE risk score: a multicentre study

  • PRAISE study group
  • Ospedale Maggiore
  • CPO Piedmont-AOU Citta della Salute e della Scienza, 10131 Turin, Italy
  • IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo - Pavia
  • Viral Evolution and Transmission Unit, Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
  • San Giovanni Bosco Hub Hospital
  • Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Frankfurt, Germany
  • Infectious Diseases Unit, Spain
  • Azienda Ospedaliera S. Luigi Gonzaga
  • Adult Critical Care, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
  • Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
  • Hospital Universitario de Canarias
  • Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

AIMS: To establish the safety and efficacy of different dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) combinations in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) according to their baseline ischaemic and bleeding risk estimated with a machine learning derived model [machine learning-based prediction of adverse events following an acute coronary syndrome (PRAISE) score]. METHODS AND RESULTS: Incidences of death, re-acute myocardial infarction (re-AMI), and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3-5 bleeding with aspirin plus different P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel or potent P2Y12 inhibitors: ticagrelor or prasugrel) were appraised among patients of the PRAISE data set grouped in four subcohorts: low-to-moderate ischaemic and bleeding risk; low-to-moderate ischaemic risk and high bleeding risk; high ischaemic risk and low-to-moderate bleeding risk; and high ischaemic and bleeding risk. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the outcome measures were derived with inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. Among patients with low-to-moderate bleeding risk, clopidogrel was associated with higher rates of re-AMI in those at low-to-moderate ischaemic risk [HR 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-2.51; P = 0.006] and increased risk of death (HR 3.2, 1.45-4.21; P = 0.003) and re-AMI (HR 2.23, 1.45-3.41; P < 0.001) in those at high ischaemic risk compared with prasugrel or ticagrelor, without a difference in the risk of major bleeding. Among patients with high bleeding risk, clopidogrel showed comparable risk of death, re-AMI, and major bleeding vs. potent P2Y12 inhibitors, regardless of the baseline ischaemic risk. CONCLUSION: Among ACS patients with non-high risk of bleeding, the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitors is associated with a lower risk of death and recurrent ischaemic events, without bleeding excess. Patients deemed at high bleeding risk may instead be safely addressed to a less intensive DAPT strategy with clopidogrel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)881-891
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes
Volume8
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Acute coronary syndromes (ACSs)
  • Artificial intelligence (AI)
  • Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT)
  • P2Y12 inhibitors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and efficacy of different P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndromes stratified by the PRAISE risk score: a multicentre study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this