Abstract
An evaluation of the most commonly used ROM measures in Dutch psychiatry is lacking, both for severe mental illnesses and for common psychiatric disorders. To provide an overview of the characteristics and quality of outcome measures. A literature study yielded six outcome measures. The psychometrical, clinical and practical aspects of these scales are described. The measures are suitable and are of adequate quality. It remains to be seen if any of the outcome measures are suitable for both serious and less serious mental illnesses. The use of a combination of a self-rating scale and an observerrating scale that measure symptoms and domains of functioning may be the most promising choice
| Original language | Dutch |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 147-152 |
| Journal | Tijdschrift voor psychiatrie |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver