Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Robot-Assisted Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Radioguided Surgery in Primary Diagnosed Prostate Cancer

  • William Gondoputro
  • , Matthijs J. Scheltema
  • , Alexander Blazevski
  • , Paul Doan
  • , James E. Thompson
  • , Amer Amin
  • , Bart Geboers
  • , Shikha Agrawal
  • , Amila Siriwardana
  • , Pim J. van Leeuwen
  • , Matthias N. van Oosterom
  • , Fijs W. B. van Leeuwen
  • , Louise Emmett
  • , Phillip D. Stricker
  • Kinghorn Cancer Centre
  • NSW
  • University of New South Wales
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney
  • Leiden University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of 99mTc-based prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) robot-assisted-radioguided surgery to aid or improve the intraoperative detection of lymph node metastases during primary robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Men with primary high-risk PCa (≥ cT3a, International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group ≥ 3 or prostate-specific antigen of ≥ 15 ng/mL) with potential lymph node metastasis (Briganti nomogram risk > 10% or on preoperative imaging) were enrolled in the study. Patients underwent staging 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scanning. Preoperatively, a 99mTc-labeled PSMA ligand (99mTc PSMA I&S; 500 MBq) was administered followed by SPECT/CT. A RARP including extended pelvic lymph node dissection was performed, with intraoperative tracing of PSMA-avid tissues using a prototype DROP-IN γ-probe. Resected specimens were also measured ex vivo. Histopathologic concordance with probe findings was evaluated. A radiotracer count of ≥ 1.5 times the background reference (in vivo), and ≥ 10 (absolute count) in the ex vivo setting, was considered positive. Results: Twelve patients were included (median age, 68 y, and prostate-specific antigen, 9.15 ng/mL). Most of the patients harbored ISUP 5 PCa (75%) and had avid lymph nodes on preoperative PSMA PET (64%). The DROP-IN probe aided resection of PSMA-avid (out-of-template) lymph nodes and residual disease at the prostate bed. Eleven metastatic lymph nodes were identified by the probe that were not observed on preoperative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Of the 74 extraprostatic tissue specimens that were resected, 22 (29.7%) contained PCa. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of inpatient use of the γ-probe were 76% (95% CI, 53%-92%), 69% (95% CI, 55%-81%), 50%, and 88%, respectively. Ex vivo, the diagnostic accuracy was superior: 76% (95% CI, 53%-92%), 96% (95% CI, 87%-99%), 89%, and 91%, respectively, for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Of the missed lymph nodes in vivo (n = 5) and ex vivo (n = 5), 90% were micrometastasis (≤3 mm). No complications greater than Clavien-Dindo Grade I occurred. Conclusion: Robot-assisted 99mTc-based PSMA-radioguided surgery is feasible and safe in the primary setting, optimizing the detection of nodal metastases at the time of RARP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Further improvement of the detector technology may optimize the capabilities of robot-assisted 99mTc-based PSMA-radioguided surgery.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1659-1664
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of nuclear medicine
Volume63
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • extended pelvic lymph node dissection
  • image-guided surgery
  • prostate cancer
  • prostate-specific membrane antigen
  • robot-assisted surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Robot-Assisted Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Radioguided Surgery in Primary Diagnosed Prostate Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this