Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Risk prediction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma improves when combining baseline PET features with interim PET response

  • Jakoba J. Eertink
  • , Martijn W. Heymans
  • , Sanne E. Wiegers
  • , Annelies L. Bes
  • , Ulrich Dührsen
  • , Andreas Hüttmann
  • , Lars Kurch
  • , Sally F. Barrington
  • , George N. Mikhaeel
  • , Pieternella J. Lugtenburg
  • , Luca Ceriani
  • , Emanuele Zucca
  • , Tamas Györke
  • , S. ndor Czibor
  • , behalf of the PETRA Consortium
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • Leipzig University
  • King's College London & Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre
  • King's College London
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Università della Svizzera italiana
  • Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research
  • Semmelweis University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Accurate detection of patients at high risk of treatment failure following first-line immunochemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is of paramount importance as patients might benefit from early treatment escalation. Recently, we introduced the International Metabolic Prognostic Index (IMPI) based on metabolic tumor volume (MTV), age and stage that outperformed the International Prognostic Index. However, radiomic features such as the maximum distance between the largest lesion and another lesion (Dmaxbulk) or the peak standardized uptake value (SUVpeak) along with early treatment response at interim positron emission tomography (iPET) based on ∆SUVmax may have additional predictive value. We tested different models for risk prediction aiming to develop a dynamic risk tool. All patients within the PETRA database with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with R-CHOP, who had available clinical data, baseline PET and iPET scans were included. The optimal transformation of Dmaxbulk, SUVpeak and ∆SUVmax was determined by choosing the best fitting Cox regression model with lowest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), while the cross-validated c-index was obtained as a measure for discrimination. Risk models were developed using clinical, baseline PET and iPET data. The best risk model was compared to the IMPI and our subsequent ClinicalPET model. A total of 1,014 patients were included in the analyses. Best baseline model included age, MTV and Dmaxbulk (AIC 3208.89, c-index 0.70). Adding iPET response further improved outcome prediction (AIC 3140.36, c-index 0.74) with wider segregation of Kaplan-Meier curves and improved rates of correct risk classification, supporting the value of a dynamic risk assessment in DLBCL.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2413-2421
Number of pages9
JournalHaematologica
Volume110
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk prediction in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma improves when combining baseline PET features with interim PET response'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this