Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial, of labour

  • Wilbert A. Spaans
  • , Myrthe B. Sluijs
  • , Jos van Roosmalen
  • , Otto P. Bleker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To identify risk factors at caesarean section (CS), related to failure of a trial of labour (TOL) in subsequent pregnancy. Study design: Hospital records (1988-1999) of the index pregnancy were reviewed at caesarean delivery for oxytocine use, indication for caesarean, dilatation of cervix, speed of dilatation, duration of contractions and birth weight. The records of the subsequent pregnancy were reviewed for successful vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC), maternal and neonatal outcome. Data were tested for statistical significance with a Mantel-Haenszel equation for odds ratios (OR, with 95% confidence interval (CI)), a Fisher exact test or a Student's T-test. Results: From 214 women with a previous caesarean section, 68.7% underwent a TOL, which was successful in 71.4%. A labour pattern during the index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use (OR = 3.1; 95% Cl = 1.4-7.1), contractions for more than 12 h (OR = 3.0; 95% Cl = 1.3-7.0) and cervical dilatation less than 1 cm/h (OR = 5.6; 95% Cl = 1.1-39.4) increased the risk of a failed TOL at subsequent labour significantly. Conclusion: Women who attempt VBAC may be informed that a labour pattern of their index pregnancy characterised by oxytocine use, contractions for more than 12 h and slow dilatation is associated with a reduced chance of success. A partograph obtained during first labour can be a managerial tool for subsequent labour. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)163-166
JournalEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
Volume100
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk factors at caesarean section and failure of subsequent trial, of labour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this