Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Risk assessment and management strategies in older patients with acute pulmonary embolism

  • Dieuwke Luijten*
  • , Denise Abbel
  • , Suzanne C. Cannegieter
  • , Jeroen Eikenboom
  • , Paul L. den Exter
  • , Jacobijn Gussekloo
  • , Menno V. Huisman
  • , Thijs E. van Mens
  • , Lara Tahir
  • , Stella Trompet
  • , Simon P. Mooijaart
  • , Frederikus A. Klok
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Leiden University
  • Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Managing older patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is challenging due to their underrepresentation in clinical trials, comorbidities, and increased complication risk. Objectives: To evaluate risk assessment and management outcomes in older patients with PE focusing on home and reperfusion treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged 70 years or older diagnosed with acute PE at an academic medical center (2015-2022). Results: In total, 242 patients with a mean age of 77 years were included. All 59 patients with negative Hestia criteria were discharged ≤24 hours, and in total, 81 patients (35%) received home treatment. Among these 14-day mortality and recurrent venous thromboembolism were 0% and major bleeding occurred in 1.3% (1 patient, 95% CI: 0.11-6.1). European Society of Cardiology risk classification showed 9 low-risk (3.9%), 199 intermediate-risk (87%), and 20 high-risk (8.8) patients with PE. In 5 of the 20 high-risk patients, hypotension was mainly caused by another condition, that is, sepsis. Eight high-risk patients received reperfusion therapy. The 14-day mortality rate was 51% in high-risk patients (95% CI: 27-71); 5 of 8 patients receiving reperfusion treatment died within 5 days. Patients with an Acute Presenting Older Patient score of ≥45% had higher 14-day mortality (28%; 95% CI: 12-46) compared with <45% (3.2%; 95% CI: 0.85-8.3; hazard ratios: 10.2; 95% CI: 2.6-39). Conclusion: Selecting for home treatment using Hestia criteria was safe for older patients with PE in our cohort. Mortality in the high-risk group was high also when receiving reperfusion treatment. The European Society of Cardiology risk classification and Acute Presenting Older Patient score identified patients at higher mortality risk, suggesting their potential utility in clinical decision-making.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Emergency Medical Services
  • clinical decision-making
  • frail elderly
  • geriatrics
  • pulmonary embolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk assessment and management strategies in older patients with acute pulmonary embolism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this