Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reproductive outcomes and reproductive health care utilization among male survivors of childhood cancer: A DCCSS-LATER study

  • Joyce J. M. Claessens*
  • , Adriaan Penson
  • , Ewald M. Bronkhorst
  • , Leontien C. M. Kremer
  • , Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder
  • , Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo
  • , Wim J. E. Tissing
  • , Helena J. H. van der Pal
  • , Nicole M. A. Blijlevens
  • , Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink
  • , A. Birgitta Versluys
  • , Dorine Bresters
  • , C. cile M. Ronckers
  • , Iris Walraven
  • , Catharina C. M. Beerendonk
  • , Jacqueline J. Loonen
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
  • Utrecht University
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • University of Groningen
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Erasmus MC – Sophia Children's Hospital
  • Leiden University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Treatment-related gonadal dysfunction leading to fertility problems is a frequently encountered late effect in childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). This study evaluated reproductive outcomes and reproductive health care utilization among male CCSs compared with male siblings. Methods: A nationwide cohort study was conducted as part of the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor LATER study part 1, a questionnaire and linkage study. A questionnaire addressing reproductive outcomes and reproductive health care was completed by 1317 male CCSs and 407 male siblings. A total of 491 CCSs and 185 siblings had a previous or current desire for children and were included in this study. Results: Fewer CCSs had biological children compared with siblings (65% vs. 88%; p <.001). The type of conception by men who fathered a child was comparable between CCSs and siblings (spontaneous conception of 90% of both groups; p =.86). The percentage of men who had consulted a reproductive specialist because of not siring a pregnancy was higher in CCSs compared with siblings (34% vs. 12%; p <.001). Following consultation, fewer CCSs underwent assisted reproductive techniques (ART) compared with siblings (41% vs. 77%; p =.001). After ART, fewer CCSs fathered a child compared with siblings (49% vs. 94%; p =.001). Conclusions: More male survivors consult a reproductive specialist, but fewer survivors undergo ART and father a child after ART compared with siblings. This insight is important for understanding potential problems faced by survivors regarding family planning and emphasizes the importance of collaboration between oncologists and reproductive specialists.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCancer
Early online date2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 5 - Gender Equality
    SDG 5 Gender Equality

Keywords

  • assisted reproductive techniques
  • childhood cancer survivors
  • infertility
  • male
  • reproductive health services

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reproductive outcomes and reproductive health care utilization among male survivors of childhood cancer: A DCCSS-LATER study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this