Reply: Flawed methods explain the effect of mammography screening in Nijmegen

A. L. M. Verbeek; M. J. M. Broeders; G. van Schoor; S. M. Moss; J. D. M. Otten; R. Donders; E. Paap; G. J. den Heeten; R. Holland

doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.265

Reply: Flawed methods explain the effect of mammography screening in Nijmegen

A. L. M. Verbeek
, M. J. M. Broeders
, G. van Schoor
, S. M. Moss
, J. D. M. Otten
, R. Donders
, E. Paap
, G. J. den Heeten
, R. Holland

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	594-595
Journal	British journal of cancer
Volume	105
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.265
Publication status	Published - 2011

Access to Document

10.1038/bjc.2011.265

Cite this

@article{187c77aa432942458cbe128755c338f7,

title = "Reply: Flawed methods explain the effect of mammography screening in Nijmegen",

author = "Verbeek, \{A. L. M.\} and Broeders, \{M. J. M.\} and \{van Schoor\}, G. and Moss, \{S. M.\} and Otten, \{J. D. M.\} and R. Donders and E. Paap and \{den Heeten\}, \{G. J.\} and R. Holland",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1038/bjc.2011.265",

language = "English",

volume = "105",

pages = "594--595",

journal = "British journal of cancer",

issn = "0007-0920",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply: Flawed methods explain the effect of mammography screening in Nijmegen

AU - Verbeek, A. L. M.

AU - Broeders, M. J. M.

AU - van Schoor, G.

AU - Moss, S. M.

AU - Otten, J. D. M.

AU - Donders, R.

AU - Paap, E.

AU - den Heeten, G. J.

AU - Holland, R.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

U2 - 10.1038/bjc.2011.265

DO - 10.1038/bjc.2011.265

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 21792202

SN - 0007-0920

VL - 105

SP - 594

EP - 595

JO - British journal of cancer

JF - British journal of cancer

IS - 4

ER -