Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Replication and trustworthiness

  • Rik Peels*
  • , Lex Bouter
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Vrije Universiteit (VU) Amsterdam and VU Medical Center
  • University of Amsterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper explores various relations that exist between replication and trustworthiness. After defining “trust”, “trustworthiness”, “replicability”, “replication study”, and “successful replication”, we consider, respectively, how trustworthiness relates to each of the three main kinds of replication: reproductions, direct replications, and conceptual replications. Subsequently, we explore how trustworthiness relates to the intentionality of a replication. After that, we discuss whether the trustworthiness of research findings depends merely on evidential considerations or also on what is at stake. We conclude by adding replication to the other issues that should be considered in assessing the trustworthiness of research findings: (1) the likelihood of the findings before the primary study was done (that is, the prior probability of the findings), (2) the study size and the methodological quality of the primary study, (3) the number of replications that were performed and the quality and consistency of their aggregated findings, and (4) what is at stake.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-87
JournalAccountability in Research
Volume30
Issue number2
Early online date2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Replication
  • replicability
  • reproducibility
  • trust
  • trustworthiness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Replication and trustworthiness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this