Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Relief of Obstruction in Left-Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer: Nationwide Analysis of Applied Treatment in the Palliative Setting

  • Scientific department, Leiden, Netherlands
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
  • Reinier de Graaf Groep
  • Isala Clinics
  • Meander Medisch Centrum
  • Erasmus MC
  • University of Amsterdam
  • Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing
  • Vrije Universiteit (VU) Amsterdam and VU Medical Center
  • University of Groningen
  • Meander Medical Center
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: For relief of bowel obstruction in left-sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC), a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) or decompressing stoma (DS) can be placed. In a curative setting, these two strategies have been extensively studied as a bridge to elective resection. Guidelines recommend SEMS as the preferred option in the palliative setting, but adherence in daily practice is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to gain more insight into patients with LSOCC who received palliative treatment with SEMS or DS at a national level. Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted in the Netherlands. Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) on all patients with LSOCC treated with DS or SEMS not followed by resection of the primary tumour between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, were analysed. Type of treatment (DS or SEMS) for different clinical scenarios, was the main outcome of this study, and was also evaluated over the years (2015–2019). Results: Palliative treatment with SEMS or DS for LSOCC was performed in 1077 patients, of whom 79.2% had metastatic disease (M1). Patients without metastatic disease (M0) were older (≥ 80 years M0 67.4%, M1 25.3%, P < 0.001), had a worse clinical condition (ASA III 51.4% versus 36.37%, ASA IV-V 13.3% versus 4.0% P < 0.001) and presented with higher tumour stage (cT4 55.4% versus 33.5%, % P < 0.001). DS was performed in 91.5% of the patients and SEMS in 8.5%. The proportion of DS did not significantly differ between patients with M1 and M0 (91.8% vs. 90.2% respectively, P = 0.525). No increase in SEMS application was observed over the years, with a stable overall proportion of DS of 91–92% per year. In the multivariable analyses, ninety-day mortality and overall survival were not significantly different between SEMS and DS. Conclusions: This study revealed that DS was the primary treatment modality for palliative management of LSOCC in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2019, while the guidelines recommended SEMS as preferred treatment. For patients with LSOCC eligible for stenting in the palliative setting, SEMS placement should become more available and accessible as the preferred treatment option, to avoid a stoma in the terminal phase of life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)691-701
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of gastrointestinal cancer
Volume55
Issue number2
Early online date2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Decompressing stoma
  • Left-sided obstructive colon cancer
  • Palliative
  • Stent

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relief of Obstruction in Left-Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer: Nationwide Analysis of Applied Treatment in the Palliative Setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this