Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the reliability of diagnostic assessment based on clinical observations by physical therapists. Design: interobserver studies between two pairs of physical therapists. Setting: two primary-care physical therapy practices. Patients: all applying to the practices for treatment. Exclusions: physical therapy in previous 3 months, or need for acute treatment. Assessments: schedule derived from the 1CIDH. Results: agreement on disabilities better than on impairments, the latter revealing problems particularly with pain and restricted range of motion. Conclusions: reliability of assessments of most of the categories considered was reliable; in two categories the reliability was poor, and the categories were modified.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 61-65 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Disability and rehabilitation |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1990 |
Keywords
- Diagnostic assessment
- ICIDH
- Physical therapy
- Survey research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of the assessment of impairments and disabilities in survey Research in the field of physical therapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver