Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Regional Differences in Incident Prefrailty and Frailty

  • Sarah E. Tom
  • , Allison Wyman
  • , Nancy F. Woods
  • , Frederick A. Anderson
  • , Jonathan D. Adachi
  • , Roland D. Chapurlat
  • , Juliet E. Compston
  • , Cyrus Cooper
  • , Adolfo Díez-Pérez
  • , Stephen H. Gehlbach
  • , Susan L. Greenspan
  • , Frederick H. Hooven
  • , Lyn March
  • , J. Coen Netelenbos
  • , Jeri W. Nieves
  • , Johannes Pfeilschifter
  • , Maurizio Rossini
  • , Christian Roux
  • , Kenneth G. Saag
  • , Ethel S. Siris
  • Stuart Silverman, Nelson B. Watts, Andrea Z. LaCroix
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • University of Washington, Seattle
  • McMaster University
  • Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • University of Southampton
  • Autonomous University of Barcelona
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • The University of Sydney
  • Helen Hayes Hospital and Columbia University, West Haverstraw, United States
  • Department of Internal Medicine III, Essen, Germany
  • University of Verona
  • Paris Descartes University
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Columbia University Medical Center
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Mercy Health - Osteoporosis and Bone Health Services, Cincinnati, United States
  • University of California, San Diego

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The extent to which greater frailty among American compared with European women reflects individual-level characteristics has not been well studied. To test the hypothesis that cardiometabolic conditions and depression and anxiety confound the relationship between region and incident prefrailty and frailty in American compared with European women. Materials and Methods: The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) is a 5-year observational cohort study of women aged ≥55 years. A total of 19,674 participants from the United States and Europe were nonfrail at baseline and provided information on characteristics, including body mass index, depression and anxiety, and cardiovascular disease. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to examine the relationship between region and incident frailty and prefrailty. Results: Over 40% of respondents became prefrail or frail during follow-up. Adjusting for age, body mass index, depression and anxiety, cardiovascular disease, and other health-related characteristics, European respondents had a decreased risk of developing prefrailty (2-year hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73-0.84; 3-year HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.67-0.81) and frailty (2-year HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.56-0.76; 3-year HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68-0.99) compared with American respondents. Risk of incident frailty and prefrailty did not vary by region at 5 years of follow-up. Conclusions: Cardiometabolic conditions and depression and anxiety did not account for increased frailty and prefrailty onset among American compared with European women. Differences in smaller regions and environmental characteristics may contribute to frailty and prefrailty.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)992-998
JournalJournal of Women's Health
Volume26
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regional Differences in Incident Prefrailty and Frailty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this