Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Real-world outcomes of advanced melanoma patients not represented in phase III trials

  • Michiel C. T. van Zeijl
  • , Rawa K. Ismail
  • , Liesbeth C. de Wreede
  • , Alfonsus J. M. van den Eertwegh
  • , Anthonius de Boer
  • , Maaike van Dartel
  • , Doranne L. Hilarius
  • , Maureen J. B. Aarts
  • , Franchette W. P. J. van den Berkmortel
  • , Marye J. Boers-Sonderen
  • , Jan-Willem B. de Groot
  • , Geke A. P. Hospers
  • , Ellen Kapiteijn
  • , Djura Piersma
  • , Rozemarijn S. van Rijn
  • , Karijn P. M. Suijkerbuijk
  • , Albert J. ten Tije
  • , Astrid A. M. van der Veldt
  • , Gerard Vreugdenhil
  • , John B. A. G. Haanen
  • Michel W. J. M. Wouters*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Scientific department, Leiden, Netherlands
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • Utrecht University
  • Medicines Evaluation Board
  • Amsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdam
  • Department of Pulmonary medicine, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands
  • Maastricht UMC+
  • Zuyderland
  • Radboud University Medical Center
  • Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, Netherlands
  • University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente
  • Medical Centre Leeuwarden
  • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Amphia Hospital
  • Erasmus MC
  • Maxima Medical Centre
  • Netherlands Cancer Institute
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht, Netherlands
  • Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden, Netherlands
  • Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, Netherlands
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center , Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Oncology Center Isala, Zwolle, Netherlands
  • Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
  • Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
  • Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3582, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
  • Departments of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Center Eindhoven, Netherlands.
  • Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim was to provide evidence on systemically treated patients with advanced melanoma not represented in phase III trials to support clinical decision-making. Analysis were performed on advanced melanoma patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2017 in the Netherlands, treated with immune- or targeted therapy, who met ≥1 trial exclusion criteria. These criteria were derived from the KEYNOTE-006 and CHECKMATE-067/-066 phase III trials. Prognostic importance of factors associated with overall survival (OS) was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox models, predicted OS probabilities of prognostic subgroups and a conditional inference survival tree (CIST). A nationwide population-based registry was used as data source. Of 2536 systemically treated patients with advanced melanoma, 1004 (40%) patients were ineligible for phase IIII trials. Ineligible patients had a poorer median OS (mOS) compared to eligible patients (8.8 vs 23 months). Eligibility criteria strongly associated with OS in systemically treated ineligible patients were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score (ECOG PS) ≥2, brain metastases (BM) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) of >500 U/L. Patients with ECOG PS of ≥2 with or without symptomatic BM had a predicted mOS of 6.5 and 11.3 months and a 3-year survival probability of 9.3% and 23.6%, respectively. The CIST showed the strongest prognostic covariate for survival was LDH, followed by ECOG PS. The prognosis of patients with LDH of >500 U/L is poor, but long-term survival is possible. The prognosis of ineligible patients with advanced melanoma in real-world was very heterogeneous and highly dependent on LDH value, ECOG PS and symptomatic BM.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3461-3470
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Cancer
Volume147
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • advanced melanoma
  • decision tree
  • ineligibility
  • real-world outcomes
  • survival

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real-world outcomes of advanced melanoma patients not represented in phase III trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this