TY - JOUR
T1 - ‘Real-world’ eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a tertiary memory clinic setting
AU - Vigneswaran, Sinthujah
AU - Vijverberg, Everard G. B.
AU - Barkhof, Frederik
AU - van de Giessen, Elsmarieke
AU - Lemstra, Afina W.
AU - Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L.
AU - Teunissen, Charlotte E.
AU - van der Flier, Wiesje M.
AU - van Harten, Argonde C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Alzheimer's Association. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
PY - 2025/12/1
Y1 - 2025/12/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Recent approvals of anti-amyloid therapies (AAT) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in various countries highlight the need to assess patient eligibility due to potentially high costs. Estimates suggest 1-18% of patients may qualify based on biomarkers, but real-world data remain limited. This study evaluated eligibility for AAT in a tertiary memory clinic from 2020 to 2022 using lecanemab criteria. METHOD: We included 1309 patients (63 ± 8 years, 45% women, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) 25 ± 5) from Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (2020-2022) who underwent standard diagnostic workup (Table 1). Eligibility for AAT followed U.S. Food and Drug Administration provided prescribing information and the appropriate use criteria for lecanamab, along with the APOE criteria as defined by the European Medicines Agency. Patients were eligible (1) when clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD with (2) a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5 or 1.0 and a MMSE ≥22 and ≤27, when they (3) were amyloid positive based on cerebrospinal fluid or positron emission tomography and (4) <4 microbleeds on brain magnetic resonance imaging, excluding APOE ε4/ε4 carriers and anticoagulant users. For patients with MCI/AD and unknown amyloid status, we calculated a range, assuming all could be either amyloid positive (upper limit) or amyloid negative (lower limit). RESULT: Among 1309 memory clinic patients, 514 (39% of all-comers) had a clinical diagnosis of MCI or AD. Of these, 196 (15% of all-comers, 38% of MCI/AD) met inclusion criteria for CDR and MMSE (Figure 1). Of these 196, 158 (12% of all-comers, 31% of MCI/AD) were amyloid positive and 25 had an unknown status. Among amyloid-positive patients, 50 had more than four microbleeds, leaving 108 (8% (range 7-9%) of all-comers, 21% (18-24%) of MCI/AD) eligible for AAT. After excluding APOE ε4 homozygotes and anticoagulant users, 79 (6% (5-7%) of all-comers, 15% (14-17%) of MCI/AD) remained eligible. CONCLUSION: In our tertiary memory clinic, 8% of all-comers and 21% of those clinically diagnosed with MCI or AD met in- and exclusion criteria for AAT. This information can be taken into account when estimating the preparedness of the health care system and budget-impact analyses for these drugs.
AB - BACKGROUND: Recent approvals of anti-amyloid therapies (AAT) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in various countries highlight the need to assess patient eligibility due to potentially high costs. Estimates suggest 1-18% of patients may qualify based on biomarkers, but real-world data remain limited. This study evaluated eligibility for AAT in a tertiary memory clinic from 2020 to 2022 using lecanemab criteria. METHOD: We included 1309 patients (63 ± 8 years, 45% women, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) 25 ± 5) from Alzheimer Center Amsterdam (2020-2022) who underwent standard diagnostic workup (Table 1). Eligibility for AAT followed U.S. Food and Drug Administration provided prescribing information and the appropriate use criteria for lecanamab, along with the APOE criteria as defined by the European Medicines Agency. Patients were eligible (1) when clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD with (2) a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5 or 1.0 and a MMSE ≥22 and ≤27, when they (3) were amyloid positive based on cerebrospinal fluid or positron emission tomography and (4) <4 microbleeds on brain magnetic resonance imaging, excluding APOE ε4/ε4 carriers and anticoagulant users. For patients with MCI/AD and unknown amyloid status, we calculated a range, assuming all could be either amyloid positive (upper limit) or amyloid negative (lower limit). RESULT: Among 1309 memory clinic patients, 514 (39% of all-comers) had a clinical diagnosis of MCI or AD. Of these, 196 (15% of all-comers, 38% of MCI/AD) met inclusion criteria for CDR and MMSE (Figure 1). Of these 196, 158 (12% of all-comers, 31% of MCI/AD) were amyloid positive and 25 had an unknown status. Among amyloid-positive patients, 50 had more than four microbleeds, leaving 108 (8% (range 7-9%) of all-comers, 21% (18-24%) of MCI/AD) eligible for AAT. After excluding APOE ε4 homozygotes and anticoagulant users, 79 (6% (5-7%) of all-comers, 15% (14-17%) of MCI/AD) remained eligible. CONCLUSION: In our tertiary memory clinic, 8% of all-comers and 21% of those clinically diagnosed with MCI or AD met in- and exclusion criteria for AAT. This information can be taken into account when estimating the preparedness of the health care system and budget-impact analyses for these drugs.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105025732097
U2 - 10.1002/alz70860_102927
DO - 10.1002/alz70860_102927
M3 - Article
C2 - 41435131
SN - 1552-5260
VL - 21
SP - e102927
JO - Alzheimer s & dementia
JF - Alzheimer s & dementia
ER -